2014
DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2014.885880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in faculty attrition in the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
3
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
32
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several non‐modifiable factors were assessed in the current study, including individual demographics and teaching factors. The current study identified younger age (univariate) and female gender (multivariate) as being related to higher intention of leaving the profession, which has been shown in other studies to relate to attrition in a teaching population (Amos, ; Arnold & Feldman, ; Deutsch & Yao, ; Shen, ). Regarding method of certification, teachers who follow the traditional method tend to have degrees in education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several non‐modifiable factors were assessed in the current study, including individual demographics and teaching factors. The current study identified younger age (univariate) and female gender (multivariate) as being related to higher intention of leaving the profession, which has been shown in other studies to relate to attrition in a teaching population (Amos, ; Arnold & Feldman, ; Deutsch & Yao, ; Shen, ). Regarding method of certification, teachers who follow the traditional method tend to have degrees in education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…There are inconsistent findings regarding gender and ethnicity. Multiple attrition studies have indicated that women have a higher likelihood to quit (Amos, ; Deutsch & Yao, ), while others find no gender differences (Billingsley & Cross, ; Boe et al, ). When ethnicity is assessed, some studies indicate no differences (Boe et al, ; Keigher & Cross, ), while others find Caucasians to have higher attrition rates (Billingsley, ; Shen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, women more than men contend with gender-related modesty and communal norms that dictate expectations to avoid negotiations that would further their own interests, instead placing others’ needs and resources first (West et al 2013 ). These issues, combined with factors external to the institution, such as the strong likelihood that women share a disproportionate ratio of domestic and caregiving duties and may not have strong social support for their careers (e.g., Deutsch and Yao 2014 ), unduly affect women's grant-writing productivity and grant success. Changes in university policy, practice, structure, and culture are required to abet women faculty in writing successful grant proposals (Easterly and Pemberton 2008 , Xu 2008 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also little evidence of engagement with ideas or concepts from the ‘spatial’ or ‘mobile turns’, even in more recent writing. Instead, of the 35 empirical studies identified, most focus on a narrow range of ERM (notably, telework or commuting), while a few examine mobility or space as one of many of ‘explanatory variables’ (for example, influence of geographical location, amongst other variables, on job attrition and WFC, as in Deutsch and Yao, 2014). There is also a strong emphasis on elite occupations, especially managers and professionals, as has been noted by others (Greenhaus, 2008; Williams et al, 2016), rather than on a broader occupational range that might shed light on new types of ERM.…”
Section: Examining and Rethinking Work–family Scholarship Through Thementioning
confidence: 99%