2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/183074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Cerebral Regional Homogeneity of Adult Healthy Volunteers: A Resting-State fMRI Study

Abstract: Objective. We sought to use the regional homogeneity (ReHo) approach as an index in the resting-state functional MRI to investigate the gender differences of spontaneous brain activity within cerebral cortex and resting-state networks (RSNs) in young adult healthy volunteers. Methods. One hundred and twelve healthy volunteers (56 males, 56 females) participated in the resting-state fMRI scan. The ReHo mappings in the cerebral cortex and twelve RSNs of the male and female groups were compared. Results. We found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(93 reference statements)
5
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies reported results of both men and women together, while other studies only included women and not all studies took medication or hormonal status (in case of females) into consideration. This is a limitation, as gender differences in brain characteristics are acknowledged in literature (Alarcon et al, 2015;Scheinost et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015). The same applies for the large range of mean age of the subjects over the included articles as age also has a great impact on brain characteristics (Hogstrom et al, 2013;Alarcon et al, 2015;Scheinost et al, 2015).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies reported results of both men and women together, while other studies only included women and not all studies took medication or hormonal status (in case of females) into consideration. This is a limitation, as gender differences in brain characteristics are acknowledged in literature (Alarcon et al, 2015;Scheinost et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015). The same applies for the large range of mean age of the subjects over the included articles as age also has a great impact on brain characteristics (Hogstrom et al, 2013;Alarcon et al, 2015;Scheinost et al, 2015).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex differences were chosen because sex is an objective category that can be readily investigated across large scale datasets. To wit, differences in brain function between men and women have been well documented in the R‐fMRI literature [Allen et al, ; Beltz et al, ; Bluhm et al, ; Filippi et al, ; Hjelmervik et al, ; Kilpatrick et al, ; Scheinost et al, ; Tomasi and Volkow, ; Xu et al, ]. We chose to examine differences between EO and EC conditions to test whether our approach generalizes to within‐subject designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex differences were chosen because sex is an objective category that can be readily investigated across large scale datasets. To wit, differences in brain function between men and women have been well documented in the R-fMRI literature (Allen, et al, 2011;Bluhm, et al, 2008;Filippi, et al, 2013;Hjelmervik, et al, 2014;Kilpatrick, et al, 2015;Scheinost, et al, 2015;Tomasi and Volkow, 2012;Xu, et al, 2015). We chose to examine differences between EO and EC conditions to test whether our approach to within-subject designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%