PJMHS 2021
DOI: 10.53350/pjmhs2115112917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Academic Performance in the subject of Pharmacology: A study conducted in a medical college

Abstract: Background: The proportion of female students is increasing progressively in medical schools, but concern remains about differing performance in exams. A limited data is available on comparison of academic performance of male and female students from developing countries. Aim: To compare them regarding their academic performance in the subject of pharmacology. Methods: This comparative study was conducted at Pharmacology departments of Sheikh Zayed medical college Rahim yar khan and Quaid-e-Azam medical colle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of stratified random sampling ensured that the sample was truly representative of the enrolled pharmacy student population. The balanced gender distribution is noteworthy, reflecting a representative sample that allows for gender-sensitive interpretations of the results (Atif et al, 2021;Ballering et al, 2023). These demographic insights are in line with studies in similar contexts, where the age range and gender distribution often mirror broader university demographics (El Refae et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The use of stratified random sampling ensured that the sample was truly representative of the enrolled pharmacy student population. The balanced gender distribution is noteworthy, reflecting a representative sample that allows for gender-sensitive interpretations of the results (Atif et al, 2021;Ballering et al, 2023). These demographic insights are in line with studies in similar contexts, where the age range and gender distribution often mirror broader university demographics (El Refae et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Exclusion criteria were applied to students who had been expelled, had a continuous absence of one month due to illness, or had discontinued their studies during the academic session. A sample size of 491 was determined based on a 5% precision level, a 3.25% prevalence rate of good academic performance, and a confidence level of 95% (14). Academic achievements were gauged through the analysis of student records in the subject of Oral Pathology, focusing on two primary indicators: the cumulative percentage from monthly tests conducted throughout the year and the performance in the yearend send-up examination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic achievements were gauged through the analysis of student records in the subject of Oral Pathology, focusing on two primary indicators: the cumulative percentage from monthly tests conducted throughout the year and the performance in the yearend send-up examination. For the purpose of this study, academic performance was categorized into four distinct groups: excellent (>80%), good (70-79%), average (50-69%), and poor (<50%), as delineated in the study's criteria (14). Data collection involved a meticulous review of academic records and assessments of performance levels according to the predefined criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is perhaps because female students tend to have better pre-intervention baseline academic performance than males. [10][11][12][13][14] Thus, it is the male students who seem to have a greater scope of improvement post SBME, due to a lower pre-intervention baseline. However, this observation needs to be further validated through future studies.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%