1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender difference in the effect of body composition on energy metabolism

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between energy expenditure (EE) and fat mass (FM) by using a cross-sectional approach to study the linear relationship between body composition variables and EE phenotypes as well as an intervention design to investigate the effect of body weight loss on energy metabolism in both genders. METHODS: The correlations and linear relationships between body weight, FM, fat-free mass (FFM) and abdominal fat vs 24 h EE (EE 24) and sleeping metabolic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship of age and gender with metabolic rates disappeared after adjustment for fat mass and fat-free mass, except for SMR-8h. Similar results have been reported showing that the effect of age and gender on metabolic rates is mainly due to fat-free mass (Ravussin et al, 1986;Astrup et al, 1990;Cunningham, 1991;Nelson et al, 1992) and fat mass (Dionne et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The relationship of age and gender with metabolic rates disappeared after adjustment for fat mass and fat-free mass, except for SMR-8h. Similar results have been reported showing that the effect of age and gender on metabolic rates is mainly due to fat-free mass (Ravussin et al, 1986;Astrup et al, 1990;Cunningham, 1991;Nelson et al, 1992) and fat mass (Dionne et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Other studies report that FM is a more important contributor to REE in men. 21 In our ®nal model including FFM, FM and age the percentage of the variability in REE explained by these parameters was moderate (56% and 45% in women and men, respectively) and in the low range of what has been reported previously by others. 1 It should be noted that the range of FFM included in our population is less than that reported by other investigators, 9,26 which may have reduced the correlation coef®cient between FFM and REE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Other studies failed to demonstrate such a sex difference in the composition of weight loss (Ballor & Poehlman, 1994;Garrow & Summerbell, 1995;Dionne et al, 1999;Doucet et al, 2002), since changes in fat-free mass associated to diet and/or exercise were comparable between men and women. These conflicting findings are mainly attributable to the heterogeneity in experimental subjects, study design, exercise intensity and type, as well as intervention length between the present and the above-cited studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%