2018
DOI: 10.31559/baes2018.1.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Difference in Preferences for Second Language Vocabulary Learning Strategies: A Pilot Study

Abstract: Vocabulary learning strategies play an indispensable role in assisting foreign language learners in expansion of their lexicon albeit efficaciousness of each strategy largely contingent upon preferences of individual learners. The present pilot study aims at investigating gender difference in preferences for second language vocabulary learning strategies. Self-report questionnaires on frequency of usage of distinct vocabulary learning strategies were distributed to 15 Thai learners of English at tertiary level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous literature has demonstrated gender-related differences in boredom (e.g., Vodanovich and Kass, 1990 ; Von Gemmingen et al, 2003 ; Vodanovich et al, 2011 ; Liu et al, 2013 ; Pawlak et al, 2020 ) as well as in language learning (e.g., Sunderland, 2000 ; Gu, 2002 ; Lynn et al, 2005 ; Jiménez, 2010 ; Scheiber et al, 2015 ; Ng, 2018 ), whether gender differences would be similar in subtypes of boredom (i.e., state boredom or trait boredom) remains unclear. Moreover, few if any studies have differentiated the effects of trait boredom and state boredom on language learning and examined the contributions of these boredom subtypes to gender differences in lexicon learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although previous literature has demonstrated gender-related differences in boredom (e.g., Vodanovich and Kass, 1990 ; Von Gemmingen et al, 2003 ; Vodanovich et al, 2011 ; Liu et al, 2013 ; Pawlak et al, 2020 ) as well as in language learning (e.g., Sunderland, 2000 ; Gu, 2002 ; Lynn et al, 2005 ; Jiménez, 2010 ; Scheiber et al, 2015 ; Ng, 2018 ), whether gender differences would be similar in subtypes of boredom (i.e., state boredom or trait boredom) remains unclear. Moreover, few if any studies have differentiated the effects of trait boredom and state boredom on language learning and examined the contributions of these boredom subtypes to gender differences in lexicon learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Concerning the semantic fields, female students were better at acquiring vocabulary describing story characters, whereas male students were better at acquiring vocabulary related to sports and geography ( Jiménez, 2010 ). On vocabulary learning strategies, male students tended to use form-focused memory, cognitive processes, and metacognitive monitoring more frequently, while female students possessed a disposition to adopt meaning-focused cognitive strategies and metacognitive planning strategies more frequently ( Van et al, 2015 ; Ng, 2018 ). In summary, findings on gender differences depend on the aspects examined, and little research has been conducted to examine gender effects on novel lexicon learning achievement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the semantic fields, female students were better at acquiring vocabulary describing story characters, whereas male students were better at acquiring vocabulary related to sports and geography (Jiménez, 2010). On vocabulary learning strategies, male students tended to use form-focused memory, cognitive processes, and metacognitive monitoring more frequently, while female students possessed a disposition to adopt meaningfocused cognitive strategies and metacognitive planning strategies more frequently (Van et al, 2015;Ng, 2018). In summary, findings on gender differences depend on the aspects examined, and little research has been conducted to examine gender effects on novel lexicon learning achievement.…”
Section: Literature Review Gender Differences In Lexicon Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, female students accounted for 52.04 percent of college students in China, while male students only accounted for 47.96 percent. Female students are significantly better than male students in language ability, image thinking, memory, detail observation, and other aspects, which may be the reason why female students are higher than male students in the higher education system (Ng, 2018;Zhao, 2022). In addition, statistics show that the average financial performance of businesses run by female entrepreneurs is significantly higher than the national average (Elias, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%