2011
DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2011.601145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender constructions and negotiations in physical education: case studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
40
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Yılmaz [34] determined that such sub factors as team spirit, physical fitness, fun, friendship and competition are much important for male athletes than it is for female athletes. Nielsen & Pfister [25] stated in a case study based on sex in physical education that most of the male students like doing sports and have tendency in doing physical activity and sports while many of the female students participate in sports in order to have better body shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Yılmaz [34] determined that such sub factors as team spirit, physical fitness, fun, friendship and competition are much important for male athletes than it is for female athletes. Nielsen & Pfister [25] stated in a case study based on sex in physical education that most of the male students like doing sports and have tendency in doing physical activity and sports while many of the female students participate in sports in order to have better body shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He contrasted the values and practices of the community of practice of PE with the values and practices of the community of practice of computer gamers, which he wanted to be part of. That the incompatibility of identities can restrict participation in PE is confirmed by studies showing that some girls feel caught between the values of feminism and the values of masculinity in PE (Cockburn & Clark, 2002;With-Nielsen & Pfister, 2011;O'Donovan, 2003).…”
Section: Field 4: Participation Without Meaningfulness and Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Several studies have shown that gendered practices and values have a negative effect on girls' participation in PE and that boys' control of the learning environment negatively affects girls' experiences and learning (Evans, 1989;Evans, Lopez, Duncan, & Evans, 1985;Griffin, 1984;Scraton, 1993;Oliver, Hamzeh, & McCaughtry, 2009). Furthermore, recent studies have found that girls often find it incompatible to identify themselves as girls and "doers" of PE at the same time and therefore try to avoid participation in PE (Cockburn & Clark, 2002;With-Nielsen & Pfister, 2011). A similar concern has been raised by O'Donovan (2003), reporting how some girls' ability to benefit from educational experiences in PE is hampered by anxiety related to being socially accepted by peers.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies about gender and able-bodied students' experiences have revealed that while boys are generally more positive to PE, girls may experience uneasiness and anxiety during these lessons (Eriksson et al, 2003;Evans, 2006;Larsson et al, 2009;Olafson, 2002;van Daalen, 2005;With-Nielsen & Pfister, 2011). It has been argued that the gender differences are (re)produced in PE, since the lessons are dominated by activities considered masculine, that is, various kinds of ball sports, while activities considered feminine, such as dance and gymnastics, are marginalized (Fagrell, Larsson, & Redelius, 2012;Larsson et al, 2009;With-Nielsen & Pfister, 2011).…”
Section: Gender and Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of research has rather focused on the teachers' attitudes towards inclusion (Fitzgerald, 2005;Fitzgerald & Stride, 2012;Smith & Thomas, 2006). Moreover, while it is well documented in studies from various countries that more girls than boys (without disabilities) dislike PE, and the underlying factors that cause this discomfort have been examined (Eriksson et al, 2003;Evans, 2006;Larsson, Fagrell, & Redelius, 2009;Olafson, 2002;van Daalen, 2005;With-Nielsen & Pfister, 2011), research about disability and PE, just like mainstream disability studies (Bê, 2012), have seldom had a gender perspective. This is problematic for two reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%