Abstract:Research on gender inequality within different-sex marriages shows that women do more unpaid labor than men, and that the perception of inequality influences perceptions of marital quality. Yet research on same-sex couples suggests the importance of considering how gender is relational. Past studies show that same-sex partners share unpaid labor more equally and perceive greater equity than do different-sex partners, and that lesbian, gay, and bisexual people are less gender conforming than heterosexuals. Howe… Show more
“…Research by Hatzenbuehler (2009) suggests that this may occur because respondents with more discriminatory experiences respond with rumination and suppression, limiting their opportunity to receive support. Thus, differences in spousal support are more likely to be a reflection of how dominant notions of gender may impose pressures that shape marital dynamics (e.g., Pollitt, Robinson, and Umberson 2018). Overall, findings point to the importance of considering differences by both respondent and spouse gender.…”
Discrimination due to personal characteristics (e.g., gender, sexuality, appearance) is a common yet stressful experience that is detrimental to mental health. Prior work has not considered how spouses in same- and different-sex marriages help each other cope with discrimination despite the importance of marriage for managing stress and adversity. We analyze survey data collected from both spouses in same-sex and different-sex marriages within the United States (N=836 individuals) to examine whether support from spouses weakens the impact of discrimination on depressive symptoms. Results suggest that discrimination contributes to depressive symptoms, but greater support from spouses buffers the mental health consequences of discrimination. Individuals in same-sex marriages report more spousal support than do individuals in different-sex marriages, even after accounting for experiences of discrimination. Same-sex couples may get needed spousal support, whereas women married to men receive the least spousal support and may be vulnerable to stressors that challenge mental health.
“…Research by Hatzenbuehler (2009) suggests that this may occur because respondents with more discriminatory experiences respond with rumination and suppression, limiting their opportunity to receive support. Thus, differences in spousal support are more likely to be a reflection of how dominant notions of gender may impose pressures that shape marital dynamics (e.g., Pollitt, Robinson, and Umberson 2018). Overall, findings point to the importance of considering differences by both respondent and spouse gender.…”
Discrimination due to personal characteristics (e.g., gender, sexuality, appearance) is a common yet stressful experience that is detrimental to mental health. Prior work has not considered how spouses in same- and different-sex marriages help each other cope with discrimination despite the importance of marriage for managing stress and adversity. We analyze survey data collected from both spouses in same-sex and different-sex marriages within the United States (N=836 individuals) to examine whether support from spouses weakens the impact of discrimination on depressive symptoms. Results suggest that discrimination contributes to depressive symptoms, but greater support from spouses buffers the mental health consequences of discrimination. Individuals in same-sex marriages report more spousal support than do individuals in different-sex marriages, even after accounting for experiences of discrimination. Same-sex couples may get needed spousal support, whereas women married to men receive the least spousal support and may be vulnerable to stressors that challenge mental health.
“…Daily‐diary methods involve the collection of data, typically via short daily questionnaires, over a period of days or weeks (Bolger & Laurenceau, ). This approach is ideal for examining relationship dynamics that unfold over short periods of time (e.g., the effect of daily stress levels on relationship conflict) and has been used to examine gender differences in relationship experiences and consequences (Pollitt, Robinson, & Umberson, ). Finally, longitudinal multiyear data sets are rare in studies of SGM‐member couples, but they have been paramount in studies of different‐sex cisgender‐member couples in order to understand how gender dynamics unfold over time within aging romantic relationships as well as the gendered consequences of relationship dissolution.…”
Section: Gar‐driven Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet research within a GAR approach allows us to examine relationship dynamics in multiple contexts, comparing couples with two men or two women and testing whether his and hers marriages might extend to these contexts. These studies show that there are gender differences when comparing relationships between two men and two women in the determinants of relationship quality (Cooper et al, ; Pollitt, Robinson, & Umberson, ). For example, Pollitt et al (), in their study of midlife couples, found that greater gender conformity is associated with more shared power and with greater marital quality in same‐sex men couples and different‐sex couples, but not in same‐sex women couples.…”
Section: Applying a Gar Framework In Research On Aging Romantic Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies show that there are gender differences when comparing relationships between two men and two women in the determinants of relationship quality (Cooper et al, ; Pollitt, Robinson, & Umberson, ). For example, Pollitt et al (), in their study of midlife couples, found that greater gender conformity is associated with more shared power and with greater marital quality in same‐sex men couples and different‐sex couples, but not in same‐sex women couples. Yet aside from Kurdek's () early work showing that same‐sex couples report similar relationship quality regardless of gender, few studies consider whether men in same‐sex couples have better or worse relationship quality compared to women in same‐sex couples, how relationship quality differs in comparison to different‐sex couples, or whether the impact of relationship quality on health is moderated by gender in same‐sex couples.…”
Section: Applying a Gar Framework In Research On Aging Romantic Relatmentioning
This article employs the gender-as-relational (GAR) approach to enhance the study of the long-term romantic relationships of sexual and gender minority mid-to later-life adults. The GAR approach states that gender in relationships is shaped by three key factors: own gender, partner gender, and the gendered relational context. This approach emphasizes that the relationship dynamics of men, women, and gender-nonconforming individuals are highly diverse, reflecting that gender is a social construct formed within interactions and institutions. We explicate how GAR can reorganize the study of sexual and gender diversity in three research areas related to aging and relationships-caregiving, marital health benefits, and intimacy-and discuss theory-driven methods appropriate for a GAR research agenda. A GAR framework reorients research by complicating taken-for-granted assumptions about how gender operates in mid-to later-life romantic relationships and queering understandings of aging and romantic
“…For families with dual parents, childcare and household tasks may be more collaborative than before the pandemic, which may also improve wellbeing. Having a family is associated with an increased sense of purpose and responsibility for parents which has positive impacts on mental and physical health (Pollitt, Robinson, & Umberson, 2018). These effects may be enhanced during the pandemic as a result of increased time spent with children and the need to provide support and a sense of normalcy for children during a highly stressful time.…”
Purpose: The objectives of the current study were to: (1) assess the impact of household structure (i.e. living alone compared to living with children, a partner, or both) and presence of children on mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) determine whether these associations are moderated by income or sex.Results: A total of 2,524 adults aged 25-55 were included in the analytic sample. Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine associations between explanatory variables and mental distress, measured via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-4. In adjusted models, each additional child under the age of 12 was associated a decrease in mental distress (β=-0.21, p=0.03). This finding was significant when adjusting for sociodemographic variables (age, sex, race, education, household income, living with a partner, and currently having a job) and historical depressive symptoms (CESD-8). Having children between the ages of 13 and 18 and household structure were not significantly associated with mental distress.Conclusion: This study supports prior literature that demonstrates the positive association of childrearing with psychological well-being, and suggests that these benefits may be present even under stay-at-home orders in the COVID-19 pandemic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.