2007
DOI: 10.1080/08038740701646663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Care, and the Normalization of Violence: Similarities between Occupational Violence and Intimate Partner Violence in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those findings agree very well with other studies with focus on the attitudes of violence of Ecuadorian adolescents (Jaruseviciene et al, 2014). These results are disquieting since attitudes that justify violence, especially toward women and peers, are related to the aggressive behavior against these groups (Díaz-Aguado, 2004;Ferrer et al, 2006;Krug et al, 2003;Worchel et al, 2003;Yick, 2000;Wallach et al, 2010;Bucheli & Rossi, 2015) due to on the one hand blaming the victims for violence (McCarry, 2010;Muchoki, 2011; and on the other hand advocating that the victim in certain conditions accept violence (Go et al, 2003;Virkki, 2007;Sequeira, 2009;. As suggested in the hypothesis, there is a large amount of overlap in related factors for different types of violence justification, suggesting that the different types of violence are part of the whole concept of violence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those findings agree very well with other studies with focus on the attitudes of violence of Ecuadorian adolescents (Jaruseviciene et al, 2014). These results are disquieting since attitudes that justify violence, especially toward women and peers, are related to the aggressive behavior against these groups (Díaz-Aguado, 2004;Ferrer et al, 2006;Krug et al, 2003;Worchel et al, 2003;Yick, 2000;Wallach et al, 2010;Bucheli & Rossi, 2015) due to on the one hand blaming the victims for violence (McCarry, 2010;Muchoki, 2011; and on the other hand advocating that the victim in certain conditions accept violence (Go et al, 2003;Virkki, 2007;Sequeira, 2009;. As suggested in the hypothesis, there is a large amount of overlap in related factors for different types of violence justification, suggesting that the different types of violence are part of the whole concept of violence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…On the other hand, traditional gender roles, stereological and prejudiced beliefs against minorities make the victims accept violence and/or feel guilty for the violence suffered. For instance, women traditionally are assumed to be responsible for taking care of others and for maintaining interpersonal relations, even if this mean enduring violence (Virkki, 2007;Sequeira, 2009). Regarding this, a qualitative study in India found that the traditional gender roles may influence the acceptance of violence and to create a normative threshold of violence acceptance which is dependent on its intensity, justification and frequency (Go et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current findings demonstrate young women normalized violence and minimized violence, both concepts not new within IPV research literature (Cory et al, 2003;Stickley et al, 2008;Virkki, 2007). Women remain in IPV relationships for many reasons (Cory et al, 2003).…”
Section: Coping To Change Their Responses To Ipvmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In order to understand the dynamics of IPV, researchers studied the public opinions of IPV and attested that in order to understand and eliminate IPV as a practice, we need to discuss IPV in both public and private spheres (Carlyle, Slater, & Chakroff, 2008;De Jong, Burgess-Proctor, & Elis, 2008;Fox et al, 2007;Jewkes, 2002;Nabi & Horner, 2001;Robertson & Murachver, 2007;Scott, 2007;Stickley, Kislitsyna, Timofeeva, & Vagero, 2008;Virkki, 2007). Therefore, it is necessary to describe societal perceptions of IPV, which occurs in this section of the literature review.…”
Section: Societal Understanding Of Ipvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation