2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender bias in employment contexts: A closer examination of the role incongruity principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through gender stereotyping, leadership is essentially merged with being a man, rendering women leaders as invisible (Eagly & Chin, 2010;Hoobler et al, 2011;Hoyt, 2012;Jackson, Engstrom, & Emmers-Sommer, 2007;Smith, 2010).…”
Section: Role Congruity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Through gender stereotyping, leadership is essentially merged with being a man, rendering women leaders as invisible (Eagly & Chin, 2010;Hoobler et al, 2011;Hoyt, 2012;Jackson, Engstrom, & Emmers-Sommer, 2007;Smith, 2010).…”
Section: Role Congruity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, when a woman is in a leadership role, she creates dissonance in one of two ways: either by exhibiting behaviors inconsistent with the female gender role or by behaving inconsistent with expected leadership behaviors (Eagly & Karau, 2002;Hoyt, 2012). The dissonance created by women leaders often results in women being treated as less qualified than men to be leaders (Eagly & Karau, 2002;Lemoine et al, 2016) or being considered as less effective leaders (Eagly & Karau, 2002;Hoyt, 2012).…”
Section: Role Congruity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations