Gender Bias in Artificial Intelligence

Lima, Rosileine Mendonça de; Pisker, Barbara; Corrêa, Victor Silva

doi:10.18080/jtde.v11n2.690

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sentence Encoder Association Test (SEAT) [13] extends the WEAT by constructing sentences containing specific words so that the word encoders (word2vec and GloVe) in WEAT can be replaced by the sentence encoders (ELMo and BERT). Recent work [14,15] explores the subjects of word embedding biases and finds that these biases are centered around males. Moreover, Dobrzeniecka et al propose hierarchical Bayesian modeling (HBM) [16] as an alternative to WEAT.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automatically Distinguishing People’s Explicit and Implicit Attitude Bias by Bridging Psychological Measurements with Sentiment Analysis on Large Corpora

Wang,

Zhang,

Xue

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social psychological studies show that people’s explicit attitude bias in public expression can differ from their implicit attitude bias in mind. However, the current automatic attitude analysis does not distinguish between explicit and implicit attitude bias. Simulating the psychological measurements of explicit and implicit attitude bias, i.e., self-report assessment (SRA) and implicit association test (IAT), we propose an automatic language-based analysis to distinguish explicit and implicit attitude bias in a large population. By connecting the criteria of SRA and IAT with the statements containing patterns of special words, we derive explicit and implicit attitude bias with the sentiment scores of the statements, which are obtained by pre-trained machine-learning methods. Extensive experiments on four English and Chinese corpora and four pairs of concepts show that the attitude biases obtained by our method on a large population are consistent with those of traditional psychological experiments in the costly small-scale experiments. The maximum gap between the sentiment scores of explicit and implicit biases reaches 0.9329. Furthermore, we achieve new findings on the difference between the evolution of explicit and implicit attitude bias. The maximum variance gap of sentiment scores in the dynamic changes between explicit and implicit biases reaches 0.249.

show abstract