Gender-Based Power and Couples’ HIV Risk in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, North India

Abstract

Context Gender inequality is a long-recognized driver of the HIV epidemic. However, few studies have investigated the association between gender-based power and HIV risk in India, which has the world's third largest HIV epidemic. Methods Population-based data collected in 2003 from 3,385 couples residing in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, North India, were used to examine associations between gender-based power (wife's autonomy and husband's inequitable gender attitudes) and indicators of couples' HIV risk (whether the husband had had premarital sex with someone other than his eventual spouse, extramarital sex in the past year or STI symptoms in the past year). Structural equation modeling was used to create composite variables for the gender-based power measures and test their associations with HIV risk measures. Results Twenty-four percent of husbands had had premarital sex, 7% had had extramarital sex in the past year and 6% had had STI symptoms in the past year. Structural equation models indicated that wives who reported higher levels of autonomy were less likely than other wives to have husbands who had had extramarital sex in the past year (direct association) and STI symptoms in the past year (indirect association). Moreover, husbands who endorsed more inequitable gender attitudes were more likely than others to report having had premarital sex with someone other than their spouse, which in turn was associated with having had extramarital sex and STI symptoms in the past year. Conclusions If the associations identified in this study reflect a causal relationship between gender-based power and HIV risk behavior, then HIV prevention programs that successfully address inequitable gender roles may reduce HIV risks in North India.

Are interventions focused on gender-norms effective in preventing domestic violence against women in low and lower-middle income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Furthermore, women’s experience of domestic violence is significantly associated with several and multiple poor physical and mental health outcomes [1, 9, 14, 17, 21–27]. Likewise, VAW has been associated with various poor reproductive health conditions such as HIV, unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion [1, 4, 7, 9, 15–18, 20, 25, 28–41]. Therefore, VAW needs a comprehensive approaches to empower women economically, transform traditional gender-norms in improving their communication and negotiation skills [9, 17, 42].…”

Community based intervention to prevent domestic violence against women in the reproductive age in Northwestern Ethiopia: a protocol for quasi-experimental study

“…Moreover, domestic VAW is significantly associated with various poor health outcomes (low birth weight, premature birth, malnutrition, suicide, homicide, mental illness, physical injuries, disability and non-communicable diseases) [ 1 , 6 , 7 , 18 , 20 , 24 – 29 ]. In addition, VAW has been associated with HIV and other sexual transmitted infections (STIs) acquisition, unintended pregnancy, induced abortion and other poor reproductive health conditions [ 1 , 5 , 7 , 10 , 14 , 19 – 21 , 23 , 27 , 30 – 43 ]. It is a cross cutting issue which requires comprehensive approach to address it (microfinance support, equality norm or culture transformative training; communication skill in relationship; minimize access to alcohol use and community health education [ 1 , 20 , 44 ].…”

Vulnerability to Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) / Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) among adolescent girls and young women in India: A rapid review

“…Key determinants influencing sexual risk behaviours and the vulnerability of AGYW to STIs and HIV are primarily rooted in socioeconomic contexts, relationship dynamics, proximal factors, substance use, and awareness levels about STIs/HIV [30, 39,44,56,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. Socioeconomic factors such as age, educational attainment, marital status, economic status, and PLOS ONE overall living conditions significantly dictate the vulnerability of AGYW to these health risks [4,10].…”