2020
DOI: 10.5565/rev/catjl.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender as a property of words and as a property of structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the presence of masculine or feminine morphology does not directly imply the presence of males or females (see Acquaviva 2020), or that the morphological exponents of (c) only apply to things. But we take third-person elements to contain a list of descriptive features that allow to build a basic concept of the expression.…”
Section: Quantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the presence of masculine or feminine morphology does not directly imply the presence of males or females (see Acquaviva 2020), or that the morphological exponents of (c) only apply to things. But we take third-person elements to contain a list of descriptive features that allow to build a basic concept of the expression.…”
Section: Quantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguists define genders with the emphasis on grammar such as this one: genders are 'paradigmatic classes of nouns, established on syntagmatic evidence' (Loporcaro, 2018). These definitions underline that 'gender systems just provide a grammarinternal set of oppositions to define paradigmatic classes' (Acquaviva, 2020). Gender is thus a property of structures because structural properties can predictively derive the constrained distribution of semantically motivated gender assignment (Acquaviva, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These definitions underline that 'gender systems just provide a grammarinternal set of oppositions to define paradigmatic classes' (Acquaviva, 2020). Gender is thus a property of structures because structural properties can predictively derive the constrained distribution of semantically motivated gender assignment (Acquaviva, 2020). The possibility of semantic motivation for gender in the English language is raised in many works of linguists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%