1994
DOI: 10.1080/0260293940190206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender as a Discriminating Factor in the Evaluation of Teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Gender was not a factor in how students responded on instructor-related items, including instructor attitude, or student-related items. While some studies 22,28,29 identified gender bias in how students evaluate instructors, other studies did not. [30][31][32] Also some studies found that women are more self-determined in the learning process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Gender was not a factor in how students responded on instructor-related items, including instructor attitude, or student-related items. While some studies 22,28,29 identified gender bias in how students evaluate instructors, other studies did not. [30][31][32] Also some studies found that women are more self-determined in the learning process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, it is possible to say that female and male teachers have close scores to each other in both overall classroom management and its sub-dimensions. Previous studies on classroom management emphasize that gender is an important variable creating difference (Amin, 1994;Ekici, 2008;Erol, 2006;Grossmann, 1990;Güvenç, 2012;İlgar, 2007;Martin & Yin, 1997;Özgan et al, 2011;Parsons, 1982;Savran & Çakıroğlu, 2004;Van Oostendorp, 1991;Zeremba & Fluck, 1995). However, our results indicated that there is no statistical difference between the teachers' attitude and belief levels regarding classroom management and its sub-dimensions by gender (Ekici, 2008;Ekici et al, 2012;Denkdemir, 2007;Okut, 2011;Savran Gencer & Çakıroğlu, 2007).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some who are critical of the use of student voice as a means to evaluate teaching in higher education argue that students are prejudiced by extraneous considerations or confounding factors such as personal characteristics (presentation styles, body language) and the grading standards of academic staff (31)(32)(33)(34). There is currently no conclusive evidence on the influence of gender differences (both staff or student) in student evaluation outcomes (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40).…”
Section: Student Voicementioning
confidence: 99%