2011
DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2011.616808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and Military Contextual Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Aggression

Abstract: This study explored individual and military risk factors for intimate partner aggression (IPA) perpetration among Navy personnel in their second year of service. We found some evidence that job stress was related to higher perpetration among men. Contrary to expectations, ship duty was related to lower perpetration rates, even though it involves more military operational stress and more frequent deployments than does shore duty. Premilitary alcohol problems were a stronger risk factor for men than for women, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although pooled prevalence estimates for past-year physical IPV perpetration were higher among men compared to women (27.0% vs. 22.0%), six studies comparing past-year self-reported physical IPV among women and men within the same study reported higher prevalence among women compared to men (15.1% vs. 12.9% ( Foran et al, 2011 ); 18.2% vs. 16.8% ( Hundt & Holohan, 2012 ); 24.2% vs. 18.3% ( McCarroll et al, 2010 ); 9.0% vs. 5.0% ( Smith Slep et al, 2010 ); 32.0% vs. 15.0% ( Stander et al, 2011 ); 24.2% vs. 17.5% ( Heavey et al, 2017 )).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although pooled prevalence estimates for past-year physical IPV perpetration were higher among men compared to women (27.0% vs. 22.0%), six studies comparing past-year self-reported physical IPV among women and men within the same study reported higher prevalence among women compared to men (15.1% vs. 12.9% ( Foran et al, 2011 ); 18.2% vs. 16.8% ( Hundt & Holohan, 2012 ); 24.2% vs. 18.3% ( McCarroll et al, 2010 ); 9.0% vs. 5.0% ( Smith Slep et al, 2010 ); 32.0% vs. 15.0% ( Stander et al, 2011 ); 24.2% vs. 17.5% ( Heavey et al, 2017 )).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The majority ( n = 31) of included studies reported past-year IPV perpetration ( Buchholz et al, 2017 ; Byrne & Riggs, 1996 ; Dutra, de Blank, Scheiderer, & Taft, 2012 ; Fonesca et al, 2006 ; Foran et al, 2011 ; Forgey & Badger, 2006 ; Gerlock, Szarka, Cox, & Harel, 2016 ; Gondolf & Foster, 1991 ; Heavey, Homish, Goodell, & Homish, 2017 ; Heyman & Neidig, 1999 ; Hiley-Young, Blake, Abueg, Rozynko, & Gusman, 1995 ; Hundt & Holohan, 2012 ; Kar & O'Leary, 2013 ; Kelley, Stambaugh, Milletich, Veprinsky, & Snell, 2015 ; Klaw, Demers, & Da Silva, 2016 ; McCarroll et al, 2010 ; Merrill, Crouch, Thomsen, Guimond, & Milner, 2005 ; Newby et al, 2003 ; Owens et al, 2013 ; Pan, Neidig, & O'Leary, 1994 ; Rosen, Knudson, et al, 2002 ; Rosen, Parmley, Knudson, & Fancher, 2002c ; Schmaling, Blume, & Russell, 2011 ; Sherman, Sautter, Jackson, Lyons, & Han, 2006 ; Slep, Foran, Heyman, & Snarr, 2011 ; Smith Slep, Foran, Heyman, & Snarr, 2010 ; Stander et al, 2011 ; Taft et al, 2009 ; Teten et al, 2010 ; Teten, Schumacher, Bailey, & Kent, 2009 ; Tharp, Sherman, Bowling, & Townsend, 2016 ). The remaining studies measuring IPV in different time periods (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In one of the only studies of IPV perpetration risk factors specifi cally addressing the potential importance of a variety of military-specifi c factors as well as individual-level risk factors, Stander et al ( 2011 ) found that military-specifi c factors do not carry substantial unique weight. Using a sample of second-year US Navy members, rates of IPV perpetration were generally unrelated to military occupational specialty (MOS), as were risk factors implicated in the civilian IPV literature that some suspect could be clustered in military occupations (i.e., extremely gender-stereotypic attitudes, hostility toward the opposite sex, trait anger, general aggression).…”
Section: Risk Factors For Maltreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%