2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1109103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and Marital Differences in Wealth and Investment Decisions: Implications for Researchers, Financial Professionals, and Educators

Abstract: Wealth is an important source of financial well-being and investment is an important vehicle to accumulate wealth. A large body of literature has focused on analyzing the systematic differences in wealth and investment behavior across gender and marital states. This paper provides a broad overview of the extant research and its implications for researchers, financial professionals, and educators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bargaining frameworks based on the seminal works of Nash (1950) and Rubinstein (1982) have been applied in studies of the distribution of gains from marriage (Manser and Brown 1980; McElroy and Horney 1981), spending on clothing, food, alcohol or tobacco (Lundberg, Pollak, and Wales 1997; Lundberg and Pollak 2003; Phipps and Burton 1998; Ward‐Batts 2008), fertility and labor supply decisions (Schultz 1990), health outcomes (Thomas 1990) and time spent by spouses on leisure and chores (Friedberg and Webb, unpublished manuscript). Bargaining models also offer noteworthy explanations of household financial decisions, including charitable giving (Andreoni et al 2003), saving for retirement (Lyons et al 2007, Yilmazer and Lyons 2010) and investing and asset allocation (Friedberg and Webb 2006; Hotchkiss 2005; Lyons, Neelakantan, and Scherpf 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bargaining frameworks based on the seminal works of Nash (1950) and Rubinstein (1982) have been applied in studies of the distribution of gains from marriage (Manser and Brown 1980; McElroy and Horney 1981), spending on clothing, food, alcohol or tobacco (Lundberg, Pollak, and Wales 1997; Lundberg and Pollak 2003; Phipps and Burton 1998; Ward‐Batts 2008), fertility and labor supply decisions (Schultz 1990), health outcomes (Thomas 1990) and time spent by spouses on leisure and chores (Friedberg and Webb, unpublished manuscript). Bargaining models also offer noteworthy explanations of household financial decisions, including charitable giving (Andreoni et al 2003), saving for retirement (Lyons et al 2007, Yilmazer and Lyons 2010) and investing and asset allocation (Friedberg and Webb 2006; Hotchkiss 2005; Lyons, Neelakantan, and Scherpf 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This group of investors seems to make passive investments that are not motivated by self-reliance and overconfidence, invest in long-term capital formation, try to ensure the financial security of their family, make joint financial decisions, and are not impulsive with their decisions. Intrahousehold bargaining, risk aversion, and the long-term security of investments can explain the reasons for the preference for formal financial advice (Reiter-Gavish et al 2021;Lyons et al 2008;Sivasankaran and Selvakrishnan 2023;Arti and Sunita 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive sign of the coefficient conforms to the a priori expectation, implying that if a marketer is married, his/her level of investment in the marketing of value-added products of yam increases by ₦15,746.21. The increase in the level of investment decision among married marketers could be attributed to the difference in wealth between singles and married persons which is more on the side of married couples than single persons (Lyons et al, 2011). There is a positive relationship between wealth and investment.…”
Section: Determinants Of Investment Decision and Level Of Investment ...mentioning
confidence: 99%