2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and incidence of dementia in the Framingham Heart Study from mid‐adult life

Abstract: Background Gender-specific risks for dementia and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) starting in midlife remain largely unknown. Methods Prospectively ascertained dementia/AD and cause-specific mortality in Framingham Heart Study (FHS) participants was used to generate 10- to 50-year risk estimates of dementia/AD, based on the Kaplan-Meier method (Cumulative Incidence) or accounting for competing risk of death (lifetime risk, LTR). Results Overall, 777 incident dementia (601 AD) occurred in 7,901 participants (4,333… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
275
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
18
275
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative risk score performed similarly well in our sample. Our risk scores perform within a range consistent with previously reported risk scores for cognition (C statistic 0.54-0.81) [2,4,18,19] and with medical risk scores; the Framingham Risk Score is widely used by medical practitioners to predict the risk of coronary heart disease, and it is considered to perform well, with reported C statistics of 0.75-0.80 [24]. This will suffice for general public education and for close surveillance and management of risk factors in primary care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The alternative risk score performed similarly well in our sample. Our risk scores perform within a range consistent with previously reported risk scores for cognition (C statistic 0.54-0.81) [2,4,18,19] and with medical risk scores; the Framingham Risk Score is widely used by medical practitioners to predict the risk of coronary heart disease, and it is considered to perform well, with reported C statistics of 0.75-0.80 [24]. This will suffice for general public education and for close surveillance and management of risk factors in primary care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There is no difference in model diagnostics between models A and B. However, due to biological differences between males and females and existing evidence suggesting increased risk of dementia among females [16,17,18], it is best to include gender as a variable. Therefore, the risk score from model B was chosen to be the tool for risk prediction of NCD in the community.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of dementia in the FHS has been previously described [16]. Individuals with clear or questionable cognitive deficits are discussed in a dementia diagnostic review meeting during which a team, including at least one neurologist and one neuropsychologist, reviews all available information for the participants to reach a consensus diagnosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the project was later extended to evaluate additional endpoints, such as stroke and acute myocardial infarction (as part of the EPIC-Heart and EPIC-CVD projects) [4], diabetes (EPIC-Interact) [5] or Parkinson Disease (NeuroEPIC) [6], taking advantage of the vast amount of data and research infrastructure of the EPIC project in an efficient way. Similarly, other studies, such as the Framingham Cohort Study [7][8][9] or the Cardiovascular Health study [10,11], initially focused on a primary outcome (cardiovascular disease), were later successfully used to assess other outcomes such as dementia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, ascertainment of dementia is more difficult in those studies without cognitive screenings at baseline. In some cases, such as the above-mentioned examples [7,8,10], a random sample of the overall cohort was obtained, and the neuropsychological assessment was performed on this subcohort. However, this is still expensive and not always possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%