Gender and Feminism in the Social Sciences

Jenkins, Fiona; Keane, Helen

doi:10.1080/08164649.2014.928189

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Feminist theory has not yet had the same impact on public relations scholarship as it has on other disciplines (Jenkins & Keane, 2014). In this paper, we begin to explore the ways in which feminist intelligences and modalities can challenge hegemonic assumptions in public relations theory and practice.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Talking back: Reflecting on feminism, public relations and research

Fitch

James

Motion

2016

Public Relations Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Talking back: Reflecting on feminism, public relations and research

Fitch

James

Motion

2016

Public Relations Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Academic careers are social processes which involve many people over time (Angermuller, 2017). Gender shapes perceptions of excellence, disciplinary innovation and achievement (Jenkins and Keane, 2014). Gender is not a quality inherent to individuals but rather, it consists of a set of socially produced, hierarchically organised relations between men and women (Benschop and Brouns, 2003; Connell, 1987).…”

Section: Success and Excellence In Higher Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ways to write an academic life: Queering the academic curriculum vitae

Lipton

2021

Management Learning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The curriculum vitae (CV) is a short account of one’s career and qualifications typically prepared for a position or promotion. In academia, the CV chronicles a representation of the academic self in terms of scholarly activities such as publications, research grants and projects, conference participation and teaching awards. Far from being a neutral record, the CV (re)produces gendered norms and highlights continued gender inequalities in academic careers. This article explores how the CV is made possible (and consequently measured and valued) through material practices as well as via discourses of productivity, employability and success. It does this by embracing Jack Halberstam’s concept of ‘queer failure’ and Karen Barad’s theory of ‘intra-action’ in an experimental auto-ethico-ethnography of the academic CV. Using a diffractive approach, this article also calls into question the separation of the body and the materiality of the CV, our emotional relationship with the CV, as well as gendered academic labour. In theorising the CV through the lens of performativity, attention is reoriented towards the assemblage of relations and intra-actions between academic, writing, the career, the body and representation and reveals them to be complexly located within and through each other.

show abstract