Entrepreneurship - Gender, Geographies and Social Context 2012
DOI: 10.5772/35573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and Entrepreneurship in Uganda: Women Manoeuvring Economic Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ethnographic, postcolonial, FPAR research approach requires, foremost, a relationship of trust and reciprocity and acknowledgement of positionality (and what that means in terms of power, privilege, vulnerability, and incentive). Through reflection and discussion of challenges and injustices, opportunities arise for imagining ways to reconstruct the nature of systemic oppression and inequality and work towards a more just society [42].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ethnographic, postcolonial, FPAR research approach requires, foremost, a relationship of trust and reciprocity and acknowledgement of positionality (and what that means in terms of power, privilege, vulnerability, and incentive). Through reflection and discussion of challenges and injustices, opportunities arise for imagining ways to reconstruct the nature of systemic oppression and inequality and work towards a more just society [42].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Ouaye, et al, (2015) established very interesting findings, but failed to explicitly situate gender as a moderator in the relationship between social enterprises' activities and social transformation. Kikooma (2012) in an examination on, "gender and entrepreneurship in Uganda, observed that clarifications of entrepreneurial experiences remain to a great extent rooted in unorthodoxy zeroed in on correlations of male and female entrepreneurs (p. 15)". Further, Kikooma (2012, p. 27) reasons that, "the utilization of gender and cultural interfaces as conceptual tools with which to examine entrepreneurship, as both an economic phenomenon, can be seen as a first step towards rethinking female entrepreneurship discourse".…”
Section: Gender and Social Entrepreneurship/entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model drastically changed the gender dynamics between men and women, as women were limited to the jobs of household responsibilities, while men were the only ones privileged to work in colonial establishments such as tea and cotton fields (Nayenga, 1981). Formal education was aimed primarily for men, as the new economy was meant for them to work in order to pay taxes (Kikooma, 2012; zu Selhausen, 2015). Therefore, the entrepreneurial spirit of women was limited and they were considered non-economic agents (Boserup, 1970), being marginalised out of school education among other economic activities (Akyeampong & Fofack, 2014), while men were privileged in the activities that the new system introduced and that continue to this day.…”
Section: Pre-independence Period (Buganda Region)mentioning
confidence: 99%