2014
DOI: 10.1515/teme-2014-1034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genauigkeitssteigerung bei Messungen in Zweiflankenanlage

Abstract: Zusammenfassung Maß- und Formmessungen an Gewinden, Zahnrädern oder anderen lückenbehafteten Bauteilen werden häufig in Zweiflankenanlage durchgeführt. In dem vorliegenden Beitrag werden bisher oft vernachlässigte Einflüsse durch diese Art der Messpunktaufnahme beschrieben und Lösungsmöglichkeiten zur Genauigkeitssteigerung aufgezeigt. Ein wesentlicher Bestandteil ist hierbei das neu entwickelte Lückennormal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One relates to the sophisticated method of self-centering probing in double-flank contact. Although special artifacts have been designed for this type of probe characterization, the reproducibility is still much lower when compared to single-flank probing [33]. The second drawback obviously arises from the fact that the screw threads are only inspected in two axial sections.…”
Section: Classical Screw Thread Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One relates to the sophisticated method of self-centering probing in double-flank contact. Although special artifacts have been designed for this type of probe characterization, the reproducibility is still much lower when compared to single-flank probing [33]. The second drawback obviously arises from the fact that the screw threads are only inspected in two axial sections.…”
Section: Classical Screw Thread Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement setup differs largely from a conventional setup because it is assembled on a plate. • Profile angle measurement standard, PTB [5]: The focus of this measurement standard is the use of optical sensors for the measurement of microgears. The workpiece features teeth that have different profile angles on a gear rack to ensure accessibility by the optical sensors (0.5 mm module, profile angles ranging from 0°-30°).…”
Section: Measurement Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gears with a 0.1 mm module were not measured with the µCMM because the sphere diameter of 125 µm was too large for probing. However, measuring systems with smaller probing sphere diameter [22,23,28,29] or measuring methods like CT [5] are able to characterize the 0.1 mm module. We successfully performed a CT scan of the titanium version yielding gear parameters for all modules.…”
Section: Calibration Process and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%