2019
DOI: 10.1002/cite.201900022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genauigkeit der Bestimmung von Blasengrößen aus Messdaten eines Leitfähigkeits‐Gittersensors

Abstract: In experimentellen Versuchen wurde die Genauigkeit eines Leitfähigkeits‐Gittersensors mit einer zeitlichen und räumlichen Auflösung von 5 kHz und 4,8 mm in Bezug auf die Bestimmung von Blasengrößen untersucht. Als Referenzwert werden einzelne Luftblasen definierten Gasvolumens im Größenbereich von 2 – 12 mm in eine ruhende Flüssigkeit aufgegeben. Die Ergebnisse zeigen eine erhöhte Messunsicherheit für Blasen, deren Durchmesser kleiner als die Auflösung des Gitternetzes ist. Die ermittelte Blasengröße hängt in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental data for the study presented here are taken from [3]; details of the experimental setup are provided in [8]. In [3] single bubbles were injected manually with syringes into a hemisphere which was placed within the bubble column (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental data for the study presented here are taken from [3]; details of the experimental setup are provided in [8]. In [3] single bubbles were injected manually with syringes into a hemisphere which was placed within the bubble column (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local gas phase ε i,j,k is often calculated with the measured voltage U meas at each grid point (i,j) and the measured voltage in the entire liquid/gas phase, U L (i,j) and U G (i,j), respectively, leading to 3 true εnormalinormal,normaljnormal,normalk = UnormalL (i,j)- Unormalmeas (i,j,k) UnormalL (i,j)- UnormalG (i,j) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations