1996
DOI: 10.1021/jp9529432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geminal Delocalization of σ-Electrons and Inverted Tetrahedral Configurations of the Bridgehead Carbons in Bicyclo[1.1.0]butane Frameworks

Abstract: The origin of the inverted tetrahedral configurations of the bridgehead carbons in bicyclo[1.1.0]butane has been investigated in a theoretical manner. The delocalization of σ-electrons between the central C 1 -C 3 bond and the side C 1 -C 2 bonds was found to be bonding to relax the angle strains, while the delocalization between the geminal C-C bonds is antibonding in propane and cyclopropane, etc. The bonding property of the geminal delocalization was shown to be related to the inversion of the configuration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this subset includes C−C bonds that have been classified as “exotic” bonds previously, and a large number of studies have been conducted in the last decades to elucidate the detailed nature of these bonds. The members are the naked “formally” triple C−C bond in ortho ‐benzyne ( 73 ), the central single C−C bond in the highly strained bicyclo‐1,1,0‐butane ( 77 ), the strongly deformed central double bond in the strained bicyclo‐2,2,0‐hex‐1,4‐ene ( 81 ), and finally the central inverted C−C bond in 988 . The computed % ρ (%▿ 2 ρ ) are 34, 12, and 35 (72, 121, and 82) for 73 , 77 , and 81 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this subset includes C−C bonds that have been classified as “exotic” bonds previously, and a large number of studies have been conducted in the last decades to elucidate the detailed nature of these bonds. The members are the naked “formally” triple C−C bond in ortho ‐benzyne ( 73 ), the central single C−C bond in the highly strained bicyclo‐1,1,0‐butane ( 77 ), the strongly deformed central double bond in the strained bicyclo‐2,2,0‐hex‐1,4‐ene ( 81 ), and finally the central inverted C−C bond in 988 . The computed % ρ (%▿ 2 ρ ) are 34, 12, and 35 (72, 121, and 82) for 73 , 77 , and 81 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reflects the unique nature of the bridgehead–bridgehead carbon–carbon bond indicating almost pure p character 55. Because of the low s character of the central carbon–carbon bond, geminal delocalization was suggested to be bonding and thereby responsible for the ring strain relaxation 56…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[55] Because of the low s character of the central carboncarbon bond, geminal delocalization was suggested to be bonding and thereby responsible for the ring strain relaxation. [56] In contrast to the butterfly C 2v geometry of bicyclo-A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G [1.1.0]butane, the X-ray structure of [Os 4 (CO) 15 ] (12 in Figure 1) reveals an unexpected planar skeleton ("flat butterfly") with adjacent short (2.775 ) and long (2.998 ) metal-metal bonds. This unusual arrangement is rationalized in terms of three-center, two-electron metal-metal bonds, which suggest the presence of electron delocalization [57] in addition to reduced ring strain.…”
Section: Tetrahedral [M 4 (Co) 14 ]mentioning
confidence: 99%