2021
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00404-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gemcitabine with or without ramucirumab as second-line treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (RAMES): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PM is indeed a very difficult-to-treat disease with limited treatment options despite recent approaches modulating the tumor microenvironment having shown improvements in survival. The addition of antiangiogenic agents to standard chemotherapy extended overall survival both in first- and in second-line chemotherapy [ 21 , 22 ], and more recently, the association of ipilimumab and nivolumab (CheckMate 743) significantly prolonged overall survival, especially in the non-ePM subtype [ 12 ]. A larger number of PM cases and mechanistic studies is required to validate and understand B cell functioning in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM is indeed a very difficult-to-treat disease with limited treatment options despite recent approaches modulating the tumor microenvironment having shown improvements in survival. The addition of antiangiogenic agents to standard chemotherapy extended overall survival both in first- and in second-line chemotherapy [ 21 , 22 ], and more recently, the association of ipilimumab and nivolumab (CheckMate 743) significantly prolonged overall survival, especially in the non-ePM subtype [ 12 ]. A larger number of PM cases and mechanistic studies is required to validate and understand B cell functioning in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAMES positive randomised phase II study, compared gemcitabine with or without ramicirumab in the relapsed setting, with evidence of a doubling of PFS and improved overall survival (HR 0.71 p = 0.028). 16 The phase III trial CONFIRM recently reported a significant improvement in progression-free and overall survival in the relapsed setting, comparing nivolumab with placebo (HRs 0.61, p = 0.001 and 0.71, p = 0.02, respectively). 17 This was the first phase III trial to show improved survival in the relapsed setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Italian RAMES trial compared gemcitabine with or without ramucirumab in patients who had progressed during or after first-line platin and pemetrexed. The combination treatment resulted in a significant improvement in OS (13.8 vs. 7.5 months, HR 0.71) and PFS (6.2 vs. 3.3 months) [ 129 ]. The VIM trial, for the first time, showed PFS benefit of vinorelbine plus active symptom control (ASC) over ASC only.…”
Section: Systemic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%