2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC)

Abstract: This study was performed to determine the activity of adding continuous infusion (CI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to gemcitabine (GEM) vs GEM alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). In all, 94 chemo-naïve patients with APC were randomised to receive GEM alone (arm A: 1000 mg m À2 per week for 7 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then weekly for 3 consecutive weeks out of every 4 weeks) or in combination with CI 5-FU (arm B: CI 5-FU 200 mg m À2 day À1 for 6 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As 10 patients in the present study experienced early discontinuation, which is a major cause of shortened median survival time, this discrepancy between time-point survival rate and median survival time may indicate that the major drawback of this triplet GFP regimen is the difficulty of long-term maintenance rather than the efficacy of treatment. Also, this discrepancy may explain why the median OS time of the GFP regimen in the present study appears to be inferior to that of previous duplet regimens, such as the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin (7.1-8.3 months) (12)(13)(14)29,36), gemcitabine with oxaliplatin (9.2 months) (37), and gemcitabine with fluoropyrimidine (6.7-10.3 months) (9,10,28,38).…”
contrasting
confidence: 43%
“…As 10 patients in the present study experienced early discontinuation, which is a major cause of shortened median survival time, this discrepancy between time-point survival rate and median survival time may indicate that the major drawback of this triplet GFP regimen is the difficulty of long-term maintenance rather than the efficacy of treatment. Also, this discrepancy may explain why the median OS time of the GFP regimen in the present study appears to be inferior to that of previous duplet regimens, such as the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin (7.1-8.3 months) (12)(13)(14)29,36), gemcitabine with oxaliplatin (9.2 months) (37), and gemcitabine with fluoropyrimidine (6.7-10.3 months) (9,10,28,38).…”
contrasting
confidence: 43%
“…In addition, the Italian Group for Clinical Oncology Research (GOIRC) evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with or without continuous 5-FU infusion. This trial also failed to report a significant improvement of median OS (31 vs. 30 weeks) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (14 vs. 18 weeks), in the experimental arm (24).…”
Section: Gemcitabine-combined Regimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no publication biasesdetected by Egger test for the studies in all of our analysis, in the primary endpoint of OS (t=0.74, p=0.474) and PFS (t=0.35, p=0.738) (Higgins et al, 2002;Higgins et al, 2003;Huai et al, 2013). Each article included in the composition of the funnel plot did not find significant bias (Berlin et al, 2002;Scheithauer et al, 2003;Ohkawa et al, 2004;Di Costanzo et al, 2005;Riess et al, 2005;Herrmann et al, 2007;Bernhard et al, 2008;Cunningham et al, 2009;Nakai et al, 2012;Ozaka et al, 2012;Ueno et al, 2013;Sudo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Influent Analysis and Publication Bias Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 92%