2000
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin as Induction Regimen for Patients With Biopsy-Proven Stage IIIA N2 Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group (EORTC 08955)

Abstract: In patients with N2 stage IIIA NSCLC, GC is a highly active and well-tolerated induction regimen. GC should be explored in combination with surgery or radiotherapy in stage I and II patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
42
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The toxicities of induction treatment were acceptable. The major difference in toxicity between this and prior EORTC study (Van Zandwijk et al, 2000) was in rates and degrees of thrombocytopenia. There were only 11% of patients with grade 3 thrombocytopenia in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The toxicities of induction treatment were acceptable. The major difference in toxicity between this and prior EORTC study (Van Zandwijk et al, 2000) was in rates and degrees of thrombocytopenia. There were only 11% of patients with grade 3 thrombocytopenia in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…On the contrary, when cisplatin was given on day 2, 60% patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 46% treatment cycles and the haematological toxicity resulted in day 15 reduction (23%) and omissions (34%) in many cycles. The difference in toxicity was due to the different dose and schedule used in Van Zandwijk et al (2000) study ( therapy in inoperable stage III NSCLC patients. (Albain et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not possible to include all of these factors in the multivariate model (this table presents the updated analysis of our previous report (Betticher et al, 2003)). and gemcitabine preoperatively, the median survival was 18.9 months (Van Zandwijk et al, 2000), while two other trials reported median survival times of 19 and 22 months for patients with stage IIIA pN2 NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Martini et al, 1993;Rosell et al, 1999). We sought to identify characteristics of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as other prognostic factors, which would allow enhancement of therapy and help select patients for thoracotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Toronto trial (65 patients) with mitomycin, vindesine and cisplatin for stage IIIa unresectable NSCLC reported an ORR of 67.7% (Burkes et al, 2005) and a trial (47 patients) of gemcitabine and cisplatin for biopsy-proven stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC reported an ORR of 70.2% (95% CI: 55.1 -82.7%) (Van Zandwijk et al, 2000). Finally, a trial (42 patients) of gemcitabine -cisplatin -paclitaxel for stage IIIa(N2)/IIIb inoperable NSCLC reported an ORR of 71% (95% CI: 57.2 -84.7%) (Cappuzzo et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A response rate of 75% or more warranted further investigation of the chemotherapy regimens used, and a response rate of 55% or less warranted rejection. The upper limit of 75% was chosen because it is close to the observed response rate of the gemcitabine -cisplatin combination which is the most widely used induction regimen on the European continent (Van Zandwijk et al, 2000). In addition, since it is intensified chemotherapy that is applied with potentially more severe side effects we choose to set the upper limit on 75% for the power calculation of the study.…”
Section: Patient Criteria and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%