2018
DOI: 10.16992/asos.13879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geleneksel Antakya Konut Mi̇mari̇si̇nde Özgün Durum Ve Mevcut Durum Anali̇zi̇ Kantara Mahallesi̇ Örneği̇

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bunlar: Yığma taş sistem (Yapının bütünü taş ile inşa edilmiş) ve alt katı yığma taş, üst kat ahşap karkas arası taş dolgu olan (Üst katta genelde cumbalar kullanılan) sistemlerdir. Bunlardan ikincisi daha yaygın olarak görülmektedir (Erdoğan, 1996;Kutlu, 2018;Soysal ve ark., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Bunlar: Yığma taş sistem (Yapının bütünü taş ile inşa edilmiş) ve alt katı yığma taş, üst kat ahşap karkas arası taş dolgu olan (Üst katta genelde cumbalar kullanılan) sistemlerdir. Bunlardan ikincisi daha yaygın olarak görülmektedir (Erdoğan, 1996;Kutlu, 2018;Soysal ve ark., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…With their region-specific characteristics, the traditional Antakya houses have been a different indicator of this richness. However, based on the current documents, this richness has not been conserved properly and these houses have lost their authentic features owing to wrong interventions and environmental issues (Kutlu, 2018). The common point examined in the studies performed regarding the region was the issue of conserving and documenting the authentic elements of traditional houses such as atria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common point examined in the studies performed regarding the region was the issue of conserving and documenting the authentic elements of traditional houses such as atria. The limited number of national and international studies and failure of taking necessary measures continue affecting the regional heritage adversely (Arıman, 2002;Kutlu 2018;Kaypak, 2010;Demir, 2004;Pellecchia, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%