2016
DOI: 10.1080/00914037.2016.1180616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gelatin electrospun nanofibrous matrices for cardiac tissue engineering applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of the presence of amine and carboxylic groups along gelatin backbones, various chemical treatments have been proposed to introduce covalent crosslinks lost following collagen extraction and denaturation ex vivo, so that micro-/macroscopic structural features and mechanical properties of hydrated gelatin nanofibre membranes could be controlled [31]. Crosslinking strategies have been pursued by carbodiimide chemistry [29,[32][33][34], bifunctional compounds such as glutaraldehyde (GTA) [33,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] and genipin [30,43,44], silanisation [41], dehydrothermal [46] and plasma treatments [47], as well as via ultraviolet (UV) light [30,[48][49][50]. Although chemical crosslinking is the most widely used method, crosslinking agents are often associated with risks of cytotoxicity and calcification in host polymer scaffolds [51][52][53], are unable to ensure fibrous retention and minimal membrane dissolution in aqueous media [30,48,54], may cause thermal degradation of gelatin [55,56], or may lead to side reactions, resulting in hardly-controllable process-structure-property relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the presence of amine and carboxylic groups along gelatin backbones, various chemical treatments have been proposed to introduce covalent crosslinks lost following collagen extraction and denaturation ex vivo, so that micro-/macroscopic structural features and mechanical properties of hydrated gelatin nanofibre membranes could be controlled [31]. Crosslinking strategies have been pursued by carbodiimide chemistry [29,[32][33][34], bifunctional compounds such as glutaraldehyde (GTA) [33,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] and genipin [30,43,44], silanisation [41], dehydrothermal [46] and plasma treatments [47], as well as via ultraviolet (UV) light [30,[48][49][50]. Although chemical crosslinking is the most widely used method, crosslinking agents are often associated with risks of cytotoxicity and calcification in host polymer scaffolds [51][52][53], are unable to ensure fibrous retention and minimal membrane dissolution in aqueous media [30,48,54], may cause thermal degradation of gelatin [55,56], or may lead to side reactions, resulting in hardly-controllable process-structure-property relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This threshold appears to be the most relevant for analyzing cell response because the cells are mostly in contact with the external fibers layers. These values can therefore be used to compare the morphology of the different scaffolds although only an estimation of the porosity of the whole scaffold could be derived [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. The porosity varied from 80% to 84% among the different scaffolds ( Figure 3 B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biophysical and mechanical properties of the gelatin electrospun nanofibrous matrices were suitable for contracting cardiomyocytes. 66 Gelatin scaffolds demonstrated a lack of strength and suture retention strength. In cardiovascular tissue applications, creating gelatin microfiber scaffolds is one way to enhance the strength of gelatin.…”
Section: Gelatinmentioning
confidence: 99%