2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GEC ESTRO ACROP consensus recommendations for contact brachytherapy for rectal cancer

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After an initial 45 Gy/25 fx with concurrent capecitabine, patients were randomized to receive a boost with conventional RT (9 Gy/5 fx over 1 week) versus Papillon contact x-ray brachytherapy (CXB; 90 Gy/3 fx over 4 weeks). 17 The authors conclude an CXB boost, when combined with CRT, increases the OP rate in early rectal adenocarcinoma, especially for tumors <3 cm. STAR-TREC, a rolling phase 2/3 trial, enrolled 120 patients with ≤4-cm diameter tumors, and the phase 2 portion randomly allotted patients 1:1:1 to total mesorectal excision (TME) or short-course radiation (25 Gy/5 fx) versus long-course CRT (LC-CRT; 50 Gy/25 fx with concurrent capecitabine).…”
Section: Gastrointestinalmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…After an initial 45 Gy/25 fx with concurrent capecitabine, patients were randomized to receive a boost with conventional RT (9 Gy/5 fx over 1 week) versus Papillon contact x-ray brachytherapy (CXB; 90 Gy/3 fx over 4 weeks). 17 The authors conclude an CXB boost, when combined with CRT, increases the OP rate in early rectal adenocarcinoma, especially for tumors <3 cm. STAR-TREC, a rolling phase 2/3 trial, enrolled 120 patients with ≤4-cm diameter tumors, and the phase 2 portion randomly allotted patients 1:1:1 to total mesorectal excision (TME) or short-course radiation (25 Gy/5 fx) versus long-course CRT (LC-CRT; 50 Gy/25 fx with concurrent capecitabine).…”
Section: Gastrointestinalmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Alongside existing consensus recommendations on the use of CXB in rectal cancer by the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [29], this guidance promotes wider access to CXB in Wales.…”
Section: Discussion and Con Clus Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, performing CXB according to the treatment schedule of the OPERA trial, irrespectively of the tumor response following a 2–3-week interval after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, may result in overtreatment in a substantial number of patients who may continue on to a cCR following conventional (chemo)radiotherapy only [ 21 ]. Due to advancing insight and the results of the present study, the authors nowadays use more strict selection criteria for treatment with CXB aiming at organ preservation, where patients with a residual tumor of more than 3 cm and/or an interval of more than 3 months after (chemo)radiotherapy are generally no longer considered for CXB, in accordance with the ESTRO consensus recommendations for CXB [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%