2009
DOI: 10.21236/ada498995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gear Fault Detection Effectiveness as Applied to Tooth Surface Pitting Fatigue Damage

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies [13][14][15][16] have used cumulative particle counting with inductive particle sensors in combination with fuzzy logic post processing to detect pitting damage in gears. Results indicated that cumulative mass was a good predictor of pitting damage, and that fuzzy logic was a good technique for setting alarm thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies [13][14][15][16] have used cumulative particle counting with inductive particle sensors in combination with fuzzy logic post processing to detect pitting damage in gears. Results indicated that cumulative mass was a good predictor of pitting damage, and that fuzzy logic was a good technique for setting alarm thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dempsey et al have shown the applicability of inductive particle counting on gear box systems [13][14][15][16]. They found that cumulative particle counting can be used to indicate the onset and progression of pitting damage in gears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Time Synchronous Average), and then statistics of the analysis, which define the condition indicator. Generally speaking, some papers (McFadden, 86, Ma, 1995) describe an analysis, but not specific condition indictors, whereas other papers, (Zakrajsek, 1989, and 1993, or Lewicki, 2009 refer the condition indicator (CI) which is a statistic of an analysis (such as the kurtosis of the Narrowband Analysis). Finally, Stewart (1977) describe CIs which are derived as gear mesh specific statistics, usually ratio of analysis statistics.…”
Section: Gear Fault Condition Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean frequency of a scalogram was studied in Ozturk et al 31 to get features for gear pitting fault detection. In the work by Lewicki et al, 32 condition indicators were extracted from time-averaged vibration data. Spectral kurtosis was applied to extract features for gear pitting fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%