2019
DOI: 10.1186/s42466-018-0001-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GCS 15: when mild TBI isn’t so mild

Abstract: Objective: The present study characterizes patients with the mildest of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), as defined by a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 15. Methods: This is an IRB approved observational cohort study of adult patients who presented to the emergency department of a Level-1 trauma center, with the primary diagnosis of TBI and a GCS score of 15 on arrival. Data collected included demographic variables such as age, gender, race, mechanisms of injury, signs and symptoms including associated vomiting,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 34 It also supports the opinion that TBI with CGS 13 is substantially different from TBI with GCS 15, although both are classified as ‘mild TBI’. 34 35 Recently attempts have been made to subclassify patients with mild TBI (eg, complicated vs uncomplicated mild TBI) according to their prognosis. 35 36 Although these subclassifications are not widely accepted so far, our results strongly encourage such a subclassification of mild TBI, including imaging and biomarker findings as well as certain sociodemographic and psychologic factors, which have also been found to predict mild TBI outcome in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 34 It also supports the opinion that TBI with CGS 13 is substantially different from TBI with GCS 15, although both are classified as ‘mild TBI’. 34 35 Recently attempts have been made to subclassify patients with mild TBI (eg, complicated vs uncomplicated mild TBI) according to their prognosis. 35 36 Although these subclassifications are not widely accepted so far, our results strongly encourage such a subclassification of mild TBI, including imaging and biomarker findings as well as certain sociodemographic and psychologic factors, which have also been found to predict mild TBI outcome in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This finding highlights the problem linked to the GCS-based diagnosis of mild TBI, including a heterogenous group of patients ranging from a mild concussion to a potentially life-threatening structural damage revealed by CCT. 34 It also supports the opinion that TBI with CGS 13 is substantially different from TBI with GCS 15, although both are classified as 'mild TBI'. 34 35 Recently attempts have been made to subclassify patients with mild TBI (eg, complicated vs uncomplicated mild TBI) according to their prognosis.…”
Section: Persisting Health Complaints In Mild Tbisupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The most common mechanism of injury was fall at 48%, followed by motor vehicle collision at 34%, and assault or being struck in the head at 30%. The most common location of injury reported was on the road (39%), followed by inside a home (21%) [3,4]. There are several factors in our society that play role in the incidence of tetanus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intracranial abnormalities, visible on day-of-injury computed tomography (CT), are relatively common and occur in a substantial proportion of people presenting to the emergency department (ED) following acute head trauma [ 49 ]. The rate of abnormalities increases in association with the severity of injury, as measured by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), whereby those with a GCS score of 15 have fairly low rates [ 13 , 17 ] but those with GCS scores of 14, 13, and lower have much higher rates [ 15 ]. The large majority of those cases, however, do not require neurosurgery [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%