2009
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

gCOMBINE: A graphical user interface to perform structure‐based comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis on a set of ligand‐receptor complexes

Abstract: We present gCOMBINE, a Java-written graphical user interface (GUI) for performing comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis (Ortiz et al. J Med Chem 1995; 38:2681-2691) on a set of ligand-receptor complexeswith the aim of deriving highly informative quantitative structure-activity relationships. The essence of the method is to decompose the ligand-receptor interaction energies into a series of terms, explore the origins of the variance within the set using Principal Component Analysis, and then assign weig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gCOMBINE program [38] (provided by A. Morreale) was used to decompose the interaction energy between the inhibitor and the protein in each minimized complex. That is, this program was used to calculate the Lennard-Jones and electrostatic interactions between the inhibitor and each protein residue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gCOMBINE program [38] (provided by A. Morreale) was used to decompose the interaction energy between the inhibitor and the protein in each minimized complex. That is, this program was used to calculate the Lennard-Jones and electrostatic interactions between the inhibitor and each protein residue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COMBINE method, first developed by A. R. Ortiz in 1995 [30], has been widely applied in the field of drug design [31-37]. In 2010, Gil-Redondo et al developed gCOMBINE [38], a Java graphical user interface (GUI), to perform COMBINE analyses, providing a convenient tool for academic researchers. The key idea of COMBINE analysis is that a simple expression describing the differences in binding affinity of a series of related ligand-receptor complexes can be derived by using multivariate statistics to correlate experimental data on binding affinities with components of the ligand-receptor interaction energy computed from energy-minimized 3D structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several computational methods for predicting the ligand binding affinity have been available. These computational approaches can be classified in three main group: the fastest prediction can be achieved using the quantitative structure‐activity relationship (QSAR) approach, and the molecular docking simulations; the approximate estimation methods such as the linear interaction energy (LIE), and molecular mechanics‐Poisson‐Boltzmann surface area (MM‐PBSA) . The MM‐PBSA, and the LIE methods have been applied because they provide a good balance between CPU computing consumption and the accuracy desired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parametrization for the gCOMBINE was performed on the tLEaP module in AMBERTOOL14 program suits. The PDB files of the receptor protease were cleaned by pdb4amber .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COMparative BINding Energy (COMBINE) method developed by Ortiz is a powerful pipeline for the decomposition of the ligand–receptor interaction energies into a series of terms, extracting latent variables (LV) for the explanation of the interactions and then, assigning weights to selected ligand–residue interactions using multivariate statistics and partial least square (PLS) analysis to correlate with a set of ligand–receptor complexes data on the experimental activities or binding affinities. Gil‐Redondo and colleagues developed gCOMBINE, which is a user‐friendly graphical interface, to perform the analysis with defined input files and sophisticated result presentations. Since the ligand‐induced structural alternation is taken into account, ligand–receptor interactions can be better understood by chemometrical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%