1985
DOI: 10.1080/0013188850270302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GCE performance of FE and sixth‐form college students

Abstract: This study set out to examine and identify differences in GCE O/A-level performance of a sample of further education and sixth-form college students, employing selected biographical, intellectual and dispositional measures. The sample comprised 356 two-year, full-time students who entered further education and sixth-form colleges immediately after completing their fifth-form work in schools. The results show that taking account of students' dispositional characteristics significantly increases the explained va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aggregation of within-sample effect sizes. Several studies used multiple measures of personality or ability that fell within a single personality-ability classification (e.g., Clarke, 1985). Rather than allowing a single sample to contribute more than one correlation to a personalityability classification (thereby ignoring the nonindependence of the relations) or simply choosing one of the correlations at random (thereby losing the information contained in the other relations), we chose to use an aggregated estimate by computing the mean correlation (using Fisher's z-transformed correlations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregation of within-sample effect sizes. Several studies used multiple measures of personality or ability that fell within a single personality-ability classification (e.g., Clarke, 1985). Rather than allowing a single sample to contribute more than one correlation to a personalityability classification (thereby ignoring the nonindependence of the relations) or simply choosing one of the correlations at random (thereby losing the information contained in the other relations), we chose to use an aggregated estimate by computing the mean correlation (using Fisher's z-transformed correlations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%