2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30551-4_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GCD of Random Linear Forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A drawback of that algorithm is that for its proof of correctness, the arguments given to the gcd computations are substantially larger than the original inputs. In [4] we give an asymptotic lower bound on ρ a (M) (of the expected order ζ(2) −1 ) which holds starting with very small values of M. Here we present a completely explicit and slightly stronger form of that result. More importantly, we obtain an asymptotic formula for ρ a (M) which holds in a wide range of parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A drawback of that algorithm is that for its proof of correctness, the arguments given to the gcd computations are substantially larger than the original inputs. In [4] we give an asymptotic lower bound on ρ a (M) (of the expected order ζ(2) −1 ) which holds starting with very small values of M. Here we present a completely explicit and slightly stronger form of that result. More importantly, we obtain an asymptotic formula for ρ a (M) which holds in a wide range of parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…, a r ) = gcd(S, T ). (2) This was improved recently by von zur Gathen and Shparlinski [6] and they gave the following strong result: with probability at least 6/π 2 + o(1), gcd(a 1 , a 2 , . .…”
Section: Chinese Remainder Representationmentioning
confidence: 88%