2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GC-MS profiling of Bauhinia variegata major phytoconstituents with computational identification of potential lead inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their strategic positioning within the binding pocket ensures that they make crucial contacts with the ligand, anchoring and stabilizing the binding complex. Moreover these binding site residues were verified through an extensive literature survey ( Shah et al, 2019 , Taidi et al, 2022 , More-Adate et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Their strategic positioning within the binding pocket ensures that they make crucial contacts with the ligand, anchoring and stabilizing the binding complex. Moreover these binding site residues were verified through an extensive literature survey ( Shah et al, 2019 , Taidi et al, 2022 , More-Adate et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, 50,000 steps of minimization and 100 ns of unrestrained MD were performed. Then, short-range electrostatic and van der Waals interactions were computed with a distance cut-off of 1.0 nm 18 , 44 , 45 . After equilibration, coordinates were saved every 2 ps during the sampling process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANPELA 1.0 has become popular and indispensable as an instructive tool in quantitative bulk proteomics for disease prediction, [1][2][3] biomarker discovery, [4][5][6] innovative drug target identification, [7,8] novel peptide exploration, [9,10] experimental scheme establishment, [11] bioinformatic algorithm comparison, and development. [12][13][14] Although bulk proteome profiling has become progressively quantitative and comprehensive, [12,15] it has historically been limited to the relatively large sample cohorts required to satisfy an in-depth measurement, which typically represents a population average and obscure significant cellular heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%