Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Structural Steel Conference (PSSC 2013) 2013
DOI: 10.3850/978-981-07-7137-9_119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GBTUL 2.0 – A Second-Generation Code for GBT-Based Buckling and Vibration Analysis of Thin-Walled Members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The GBT cross-section analysis involves a lengthy set of fairly complex operations which has been reported in the literature, with emphasis on the recent works of Gonçalves et al (2014) and Bebiano et al (2015)  the interested reader can find detailed acounts in these references, which provide the fundamentals of the procedure implemented in version 2.0 of code GBTUL (Bebiano et al 2016). The deformation modes obtained can be divided into three main sets/families, namely the (i) conventional (or Vlasov modes), (ii) shear modes and (iii) transverse extensions modes.…”
Section: Cross-section Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GBT cross-section analysis involves a lengthy set of fairly complex operations which has been reported in the literature, with emphasis on the recent works of Gonçalves et al (2014) and Bebiano et al (2015)  the interested reader can find detailed acounts in these references, which provide the fundamentals of the procedure implemented in version 2.0 of code GBTUL (Bebiano et al 2016). The deformation modes obtained can be divided into three main sets/families, namely the (i) conventional (or Vlasov modes), (ii) shear modes and (iii) transverse extensions modes.…”
Section: Cross-section Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical illustrative examples presented and discussed in the next subsections concern cold-formed steel lipped channel columns with the cross-section dimensions given in Figure 2 employing either "analytical solutions" ("AS"), conventional GBT-based finite elements ("CE") or exact GBTbased elements ("EE"), with the objective of comparing the three sets of results -note that the first two sets of results are obtained by means of program GBTUL [24], while the last one stems from a FORTRAN code written specifically to implement the "EE" approach.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the discretisation considered (involving 15 nodes), a total of = 3 × 15 = 45 deformation modes are obtained  the in-plane or out-of-plane configurations of the most relevant ones are depicted in Figure 3. They comprise: (i) the four classical rigid-body (or "global") modes (axial extension (1), major-and minor-axis bending (2-3) and torsion (4)), (ii) two distortional modes, associated with quasi-rigid body flange-lip motions (5-6), (iii) a sequence of local modes, involving transverse plate bending with increasing curvature (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), (iv) five global shear modes (18)(19)(20)(21)(22), consisting of the warping components of the Vlasov modes 2-6, (v) a set of local shear modes, (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), (vi) five global transverse extension modes (32)(33)(34)(35)(36) and (vii) the local transverse extension modes (37-45).…”
Section: Cross-section Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Section 5 trigonometric solutions of the eigenvalue problem are considered. Finally Section 6 is devoted to illustrative examples including development of classic buckling curves and comparison of results with finite element results found using Abaqus, [20], as well as with FSM and conventional GBT results found using the freely available software packages CUFSM and GBTUL, see [21] and [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%