2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GBT formulation to analyse the first-order and buckling behaviour of thin-walled members with arbitrary cross-sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also indicated the effect of different simplification choices and have shown that, by appropriate simplifying assumptions, we can recover existing nonlinear models (for example, the beam and plate models of [Simo 1986;Antman 1995]). The method could however easily be generalized to anisotropic materials and also applied in different contexts, such as, for instance, Vlasov thin-walled beam theory, generalized beam theories [Goncalves et al 2009], or laminated plate theory [Nayfeh and Pai 2004]. In all cases the advantage is that it provides fully objective nonlinear models by a black-box procedure which only needs the corresponding linear model to be already available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also indicated the effect of different simplification choices and have shown that, by appropriate simplifying assumptions, we can recover existing nonlinear models (for example, the beam and plate models of [Simo 1986;Antman 1995]). The method could however easily be generalized to anisotropic materials and also applied in different contexts, such as, for instance, Vlasov thin-walled beam theory, generalized beam theories [Goncalves et al 2009], or laminated plate theory [Nayfeh and Pai 2004]. In all cases the advantage is that it provides fully objective nonlinear models by a black-box procedure which only needs the corresponding linear model to be already available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear ICM models obtained will obviously inherit all the approximations contained in these theories. More refined models can be obtained, by the same procedure, using more sophisticated theories, such as the thinwalled beam theory of Vlasov, the so-called generalized beam theories [Goncalves et al 2009], and the anisotropic theories for plates [Nayfeh and Pai 2004].…”
Section: Further Comments and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that a more accurate recovery could be obtained by refined one-dimensional models which can be derived through the ICM procedure from more sophisticated linear beam theories, such as that of [Vlasov 1959] or even better the ones obtained by the so-called GBT approach (see [Goncalves et al 2009]) which allow a more realistic modeling of boundary conditions. An investigation of this would be of interest, but is outside the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Numerical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the discretisation considered (involving 15 nodes), a total of = 3 × 15 = 45 deformation modes are obtained  the in-plane or out-of-plane configurations of the most relevant ones are depicted in Figure 3. They comprise: (i) the four classical rigid-body (or "global") modes (axial extension (1), major-and minor-axis bending (2-3) and torsion (4)), (ii) two distortional modes, associated with quasi-rigid body flange-lip motions (5-6), (iii) a sequence of local modes, involving transverse plate bending with increasing curvature (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), (iv) five global shear modes (18)(19)(20)(21)(22), consisting of the warping components of the Vlasov modes 2-6, (v) a set of local shear modes, (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), (vi) five global transverse extension modes (32)(33)(34)(35)(36) and (vii) the local transverse extension modes (37-45).…”
Section: Cross-section Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent progress concerning the cross-section analysis has made GBT applicable in the context of members exhibiting arbitrary flat-walled cross-sections [6][7] or circular/elliptical tubular cross-sections [8][9][10]. Concerning the member analysis, formulations/studies have been reported for various types of structural analysis, namely first-order [11,12], buckling [3,[13][14][15][16], vibration [17][18][19], post-buckling [20][21][22] and dynamic [23] analyses involving elastic members (mostly), frames and trusses. Recently, the second version of GBTUL [24], a GBT-based freeware code which performs linear buckling and vibration analyses of general thin-walled bars, has been released online [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%