Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3534678.3539441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GBPNet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baseline comparison methods for this task include a variety of state-of-the-art CNNs, recurrent neural networks (RNNs), GNNs, and ENNs, with additional baselines utilizing explicit protein-ligand interaction information listed in Supplementary Table S2 . Using the same dataset and dataset splits, results for these methods are reported as in Wang et al (2023b ), Aykent and Xia (2022) , and Liu et al (2023) , respectively. Note, however, that due to their lack of official publicly-available PyTorch Geometric ( Fey and Lenssen 2019 ) source code, for this task we include simple PyTorch Geometric reproductions of PaiNN ( Schütt et al 2021 ) and the Equivariant Transformer (ET) ( Thölke and De Fabritiis 2022 ) as additional equivariant GNN and Transformer baselines, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baseline comparison methods for this task include a variety of state-of-the-art CNNs, recurrent neural networks (RNNs), GNNs, and ENNs, with additional baselines utilizing explicit protein-ligand interaction information listed in Supplementary Table S2 . Using the same dataset and dataset splits, results for these methods are reported as in Wang et al (2023b ), Aykent and Xia (2022) , and Liu et al (2023) , respectively. Note, however, that due to their lack of official publicly-available PyTorch Geometric ( Fey and Lenssen 2019 ) source code, for this task we include simple PyTorch Geometric reproductions of PaiNN ( Schütt et al 2021 ) and the Equivariant Transformer (ET) ( Thölke and De Fabritiis 2022 ) as additional equivariant GNN and Transformer baselines, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline comparison methods for this task include a composition of state-of-the-art CNNs, GNNs, and ENNs (including our reproductions of PaiNN and ET), as well as previous statistics-based methods. Using the same dataset and dataset splits, results for these methods are reported as in Aykent and Xia (2022) and Townshend et al (2020) , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where [Gainza et al 2020[Gainza et al , 2023, dMaSIF [Sverrisson et al 2021], ProteinMPNN [Dauparas et al 2022], GearNet [Zhang et al 2023d], ProNet , PiFold , and CDConv , and equivariant networks, including GVP-GNN and GBPNet [Aykent and Xia 2022]. For protein backbone generation, the methods are grouped in terms of structure representations they use.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 21, most existing methods consider only scalar features, and the feature order is 0. For GVP-GNN and GBPNet [Aykent and Xia 2022], the feature order is 1, as it considers directional vectors as node and edge features. The directional features are used to update the learned features for each node.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation