Gaziantep İlindeki Tüketicilerin Yumurta Tüketim Alışkanlıklarının Belirlenmesi

Aytop, Yeşim; Isik, Fikret

doi:10.30910/turkjans.680088

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been determined that the after the market most preferred egg supply way was the farmers market (19.6%) and the producer (18%), respectively. In this study, the finding that 98.5% of the consumers consumed egg in their households was found similar to the reported values by Cevger et al (2008), Mızrak et al (2012), İskender and Kanbay (2014), Alkan and Derebaşı (2018), and Aytop and Işık (2020). In the research, it was thought that the main reason for the preference of the market as a place of supply for eggs (58.3%) was the fact that the markets were more dominant and more accessible as a place of food supply.…”

Section: Demographic Characteristics Of Participantssupporting

confidence: 92%

“…In the research, it was thought that the main reason for the preference of the market as a place of supply for eggs (58.3%) was the fact that the markets were more dominant and more accessible as a place of food supply. The finding that the egg supply place was a market in this research was parallel to the reported values by Erdoğan (2013), Mızrak et al (2012), İskender and Kanbay (2014), and Aytop and Işık (2020). In contrast, Altan et al (1993), and Alkan and Derebaşı (2018) reported different finding from our results in terms of egg purchasing place.…”

Section: Demographic Characteristics Of Participantssupporting

confidence: 89%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determination of Egg Consumption Behaviors of Consumers in Bursa Province

Alkan

BERBER

2022

Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, it is aimed to determine the egg consumption behaviors of consumers in Bursa. For this purpose, data obtained from face-to-face surveys with 460 people determined by simple random sampling from citizens residing in Bursa province in 2021 were used. It was revealed that 30% of families consume 10-15 eggs, 27% consume 20 or more eggs, 25.7% consume 15-20 eggs, and 17% consume 5-10 eggs per week. In the research, 47% of consumers preferred medium and 47% large eggs. At the same time, 55% of the consumers stated that the packaging style affects their purchasing preferences, whereas 45% stated that it did not. In the research, 31.3% of the consumers stated that they preferred brown-shelled eggs and 22.6% of them preferred white-shelled eggs. On the other hand, it was determined that the color of the eggshell was not effective in the purchasing preference of 46.1% of the consumers. Also, 69.6% of consumers stated that the color of egg yolk was effective in their preferences and 72.4% of them stated that they preferred dark yolk eggs. While 57% of consumers stated that covid-19 cases did not affect egg consumption, 26.1% stated that egg consumption increased.

show abstract

Section: Demographic Characteristics Of Participantssupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Demographic Characteristics Of Participantssupporting

confidence: 89%

Determination of Egg Consumption Behaviors of Consumers in Bursa Province

Alkan

BERBER

2022

Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the average annual fish consumption per capita in Türkiye is low in Eastern Anatolia, Southeastern Anatolia and Central Anatolia regions, it is quite high in the Black Sea and other coastal regions (Aydın & Karadurmuş, 2013;Ercan & Şahin, 2016). Similarly, per capita consumption in regions near the sea, for example, is 28.08 kg per year in Giresun and Trabzon (Aydın & Karadurmuş, 2013), 25.8 kg per year in Mersin; 21.5 kg per year (Demirtaş et al, 2014;Şen & Şahin, 2017), 15 kg per year in İzmir, 13 kg per year in Tokat, 12.4 kg per year in Isparta, 6.5 kg per year in Erzurum, 4.13 kg per year in Kahramanmaraş, 3.8 kg per year in Niğde (Hatırlı et al, 2004;Erdal & Esengün, 2008;Çaylak, 2013;Ercan & Şahin, 2016;Bashimov, 2017;Uzundumlu, 2017), and 3.4 kg per year in Ankara (Gül Yavuz et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Tendency of Fishery Consumption: Case of Iğdır Province

AŞKAN

2023

Journal of Agricultural Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the research, socio-economic and demographic factors affecting the fish consumption amount of consumers in Iğdır province were tried to be determined. The main material of the research is the survey data obtained from 325 consumers residing in the province of Iğdır and determined by using the commensurate sampling method. In the research, the factors affecting the fish consumption amount of the consumers were analyzed with the sequential probit model. In the sequential probit model created, the fish consumption levels of the consumers were used as the addict variable, and the inaddict variables were determined as gender, income level, frequency of fish consumption, type of fish consumed, annual red meat consumption and type of fish consumption. The model results; The variables of gender, income level, frequency of fish consumption, type of fish consumed, annual red meat consumption and fish consumption pattern were all found to be statistically significant. According to the ordinal probit model results, it was determined that the gender of the consumer decreased the fish consumption level. As expected in the research, it was defined that there was a negative relationship between income level and fish consumption level, and a positive relationship between fish consumption frequency and consumption amount. With respect to the model conculsions, it was defined that there is a positive relationship between the amount of red meat consumption of consumers and the amount of fish consumption.

show abstract

“…Tüketim miktarının artması veya dünya ortalamasına yaklaşması için tüketim alışkanlıklarının ve üretim miktarının artırılması, tüketici alım gücünün yükseltilmesi gibi faktörlerin göz önünde bulundurulması önemlidir. Son yıllarda Türkiye'de et tüketimiyle ilgili tüketici davranışlarını belirlemeye yönelik genellikle tüketici tercihlerini, satın alma alışkanlıklarını, et tüketimi miktarlarını, tercih edilen et türlerini ve tüketim nedenlerini incelemek amacıyla birçok çalışma yapılmıştır (Tolon, 2003;Sarıözkan ve ark., 2007;Cevger ve ark., 2008;Orhan & Yüksel, 2010;Akbay ve ark., 2013;Akçay & Vatansever, 2013;Aydın & Karadurmuş, 2013;Saygı ve ark., 2015;Arslan & İzci, 2016;Balcı ve ark., 2016;Balık ve ark., 2013;Bayraktar, 2015;Bashimov, 2017;Şen, 2017;Terin ve ark., 2016;Uzundumlu & Dinçel, 2015;Karakaya & Kırıcı, 2016;Karakaya ve ark., 2018;Kırıcı ve ark., 2018;Bayraktar ve ark., 2019;Karakaya ve ark., 2020;Kuşat & Şahan, 2021). Bu çalışmalar, sektörün stratejilerini belirlemede rehberlik etmekte, yeni pazar alanlarının tespitine yardımcı olmakta ve belirli bir yer veya bölgede yaşayan insanların refahtan elde ettikleri payı ve harcamalarını ortaya koymaktadır.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Determination of fish consumption habits and consumer preferences of Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University academician and staff

GÜNEŞ,

KARAKAYA,

SÖKMEN

et al. 2023

Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışma Erzincan Binali Yıldırım üniversitesi personelinin balık tüketim yapısının ve tüketici tercihlerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, 2023 yılı Mart-Mayıs ayları arasında çevrimiçi anket yoluyla elde edilen veriler kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde, frekans tabloları, pasta ve çubuk grafikler, χ2 testi ve bağımsız örneklem t testinden faydalanılmıştır. Çalışma bulgularına göre; aylık balık tüketim ortalamasının 1.81 olduğu belirlenmiş, idari personelin akademik personele nazaran daha fazla balık tükettiği sonucuna varılmıştır. Genel ortalamalar itibariyle toplam harcamanın gelir içindeki payı %81.4, gıda harcamasının toplam harcama içindeki oranı %38.4 ve Balık harcamasının toplam gıda harcaması içindeki oranı ise %3.38 olarak belirlenmiştir. Ankete katılan üniversite personelinin büyük bir kısmının besin değerinden dolayı balık tercih ettikleri belirlenmiştir. Balık tüketimini arttırma eğiliminin; idari personelde gelir artışına, akademik personelde ise balık fiyatlarındaki düşmeye bağlı olduğu kanısına varılmıştır. Sonuç olarak; kırmızı et ve beyaz et fiyatlarındaki artış dikkate alındığında, kolay alınabilir, hazırlanabilir ve tüketilebilir balık ürünlerini piyasaya sunmak balık tüketimi açısından son derece önemlidir.

show abstract

Gaziantep İlindeki Tüketicilerin Yumurta Tüketim Alışkanlıklarının Belirlenmesi

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Determination of Egg Consumption Behaviors of Consumers in Bursa Province

Determination of Egg Consumption Behaviors of Consumers in Bursa Province

Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Tendency of Fishery Consumption: Case of Iğdır Province

Determination of fish consumption habits and consumer preferences of Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University academician and staff

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About