Gazelles as Job Creators - A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: It is often claimed that small and young firms account for a disproportionately large share of net employment growth. We conduct a meta analysis of the empirical evidence regarding whether net employment growth rather is generated by a few rapidly growing firmsso-called Gazelles -that are not necessarily small and young. Gazelles are found to be outstanding job creators. They create all or a large share of new net jobs. On average, Gazelles are younger and smaller than other firms, but it is young age more than small size that is associated with rapid growth. Gazelles exist in all industries. They seem not to be overrepresented in high-tech industries, but there is some evidence that they are overrepresented in services. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

Speed in the Internationalization Process of the Firm

“…2002; Yu and Cannella 2007). Entrepreneurship theory could also use the concept in considering the exploration–exploitation process (as Keupp and Gassmann (2009) point out, time is an important dimension of entrepreneurial discovery, creation and exploitation processes) as well as in studying entrepreneurial growth (thus Henrekson and Johansson (2010) characterize ‘gazelles’ as having high growth rates over short time periods). Finally, many types of management studies have investigated different types of change processes, such as CEO/TMT turnover, strategic change, family business successions, corporate restructuring, and merger and acquisition processes, all of which involve time and thus require dynamic perspectives and longitudinal methodologies (Van de Ven and Poole 1995): we argue the speed dimension could be used in explaining success or failure in these change processes.…”

Endogenous growth through knowledge spillovers in entrepreneurship: an empirical test

“…Because we cannot use the same control variables in these analyses as in our main models, we have chosen to be conservative in reporting these results. The quantile regression results do indicate the presence of high potential entrepreneurship, but only in a small proportion of the population (Henrekson and Johansson, 2010).…”

“…This is based on the reasoning that in order for people to continue to engage and persist in technology‐driven entrepreneurship, they need to believe the future payoff of entrepreneurship will surpass the future payoff of their current jobs. Also, current research indicates high‐growth entrepreneurship is of more economic value than any type of entrepreneurship (Henrekson and Johansson, 2010). Investigating the presence of high‐growth entrepreneurship at the firm level should help us investigate (1) the mechanisms leading to economic growth and (2) the structural factors supporting these mechanisms.…”

Developing Entrepreneurship in Digital Economy: The Ecosystem Strategy for Startups Growth

“…If entrepreneurship literature is rather skeptical about the effectiveness of startups, it agrees to sustain that the so-called high growth firms (henceforth HGFs) have significant spill-over effects: "small businesses that become middle-sized and ultimately large businesses, over a comparatively short period of time, are central to economic prosperity" ( [14], p. 208). That is because HGFs are the preferential channel in the net jobs creation [6] and are beneficial to the development of other enterprises placed in the same context [43], as well as in industrial clusters [44], as they provide meaningful stimulus within economies by increasing competition, promoting innovation, and improving the efficient allocation of resources [23]. Not by chance, HGFs tend to exhibit high levels of productivity, innovation, exportorientation, internationalization, and investments in human capital [29,43,45].…”

“…Nevertheless, this strategy has often led to unsatisfactory results, notably as regard to the contribution to territorial economic growth, innovations spreading, and dissemination of skills and competencies. Even in local contexts where high ventures birth rates were registered, there have been no relevant increases of key economic indicators, such as gross income, firms' survival, or profit level (e.g., [6][7][8]). A managerial and business research stream [9][10][11] argues that the weak impact of the mentioned measures on local economy development could be linked to three main aspects.…”