Gaze-Contingent Multiresolutional Displays: An Integrative Review

Reingold, Eyal M.; Loschky, Lester C.; McConkie, George W.; Stampe, David M.

doi:10.1518/hfes.45.2.307.27235

Cited by 104 publications

(74 citation statements)

References 104 publications

(154 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A complementary form of modification, termed the moving mask paradigm, involves the use of a mask which occludes vision at and around the fovea, creating an artificial foveal scotoma, and forcing reliance on peripheral vision for information pick-up (ie 'masked vision'). Observers are free to move their eyes in a temporally and spatially unconstrained manner in both conditions, and the window or mask moves according to the online registration of foveal gaze (for reviews see Reingold et al 2003;van Diepen et al 1998). Reingold et al (2001) used a gaze-contingent display in conjunction with the change blindness flicker paradigm to examine perceptual span in a chess detection task.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Central and Peripheral Vision in Expert Decision Making

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of central and peripheral vision in expert decision making. A gaze-contingent display was used to selectively present information to the central and peripheral areas of the visual field while participants performed a decision-making task. Eleven skilled and eleven less-skilled male basketball players watched video clips of basketball scenarios in three different viewing conditions: full-image control, moving window (central vision only), and moving mask ( peripheral vision only). At the conclusion of each clip participants were required to decide whether it was more appropriate for the ball-carrier to pass the ball or to drive to the basket. The skilled players showed significantly higher response accuracy and faster response times compared with their lesserskilled counterparts in all three viewing conditions, demonstrating superiority in information extraction that held irrespective of whether they were using central or peripheral vision. The gaze behaviour of the skilled players was less influenced by the gaze-contingent manipulations, suggesting they were better able to use the remaining information to sustain their normal gaze behaviour. The superior capacity of experts to interpret dynamic visual information is evident regardless of whether the visual information is presented across the whole visual field or selectively to either central or peripheral vision alone.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Central and Peripheral Vision in Expert Decision Making

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…displays (GCMRDs) do just that, by dynamically displaying high resolution information wherever the user is looking, as indicated by a gaze-tracker, and lower resolution elsewhere [for reviews, see: Duchowski and Coltekin 2007, Duchowski, et al 2004, Geisler and Perry 1999, Loschky and McConkie 2000, Parkhurst and Niebur 2002, Reingold, et al 2003]. Human factors research on GCMRDs has primarily focused on two key questions: (1) What are the limits of peripheral visual resolution when viewing scene images [Geri and Zeevi 1995, Loschky, et al 2005, Luebke, et al 2000, Sere, et al 2000, Yang, et al 2001?…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

How late can you update gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays without detection?

Loschky

Wolverton

2007

ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

________________________________________________________________________This study investigated perceptual disruptions in gaze-contingent multi-resolutional displays (GCMRDs) due to delays in updating the center of highest resolution after an eye movement. GCMRDs can be used to save processing resources and transmission bandwidth in many types of single-user display applications such as virtual reality, video-telephony, simulators, and remote piloting. The current study found that image update delays as late as 60 ms after an eye movement did not significantly increase the detectability of image blur and/or motion transients due to the update. This is good news for designers of GCMRDs, since 60 ms is ample time to update many GCMRDs after an eye movement without disrupting perception. The study also found that longer eye movements led to greater blur and/or transient detection, due to moving the eyes further into the lowresolution periphery, effectively reducing the image resolution at fixation prior to the update. In GCMRD applications where longer saccades are more likely (e.g., displays with relatively large distances between objects), this problem could be overcome by increasing the size of the region of highest resolution.

show abstract

“…GCDs have been used to reduce the computational cost of rendering [6,14,22,27,31]), to compensate for visual problems such as scotoma [6], or to add additional depth cues [25,38].…”

Section: Gaze-contingent Displays (Gcds)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Gaze-Contingent Manipulation of Color Perception

Mauderer

Flatla

Nacenta

2016

Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using real time eye tracking, gaze-contingent displays can modify their content to represent depth (e.g., through additional depth cues) or to increase rendering performance (e.g., by omitting peripheral detail). However, there has been no research to date exploring how gaze-contingent displays can be leveraged for manipulating perceived color. To address this, we conducted two experiments (color matching and sorting) that manipulated peripheral background and object colors to influence the user's color perception. Findings from our color matching experiment suggest that we can use gaze-contingent simultaneous contrast to affect color appearance and that existing color appearance models might not fully predict perceived colors with gaze-contingent presentation. Through our color sorting experiment we demonstrate how gaze-contingent adjustments can be used to enhance color discrimination. Gazecontingent color holds the promise of expanding the perceived color gamut of existing display technology and enabling people to discriminate color with greater precision.

show abstract

Gaze-Contingent Multiresolutional Displays: An Integrative Review

Cited by 104 publications

References 104 publications

The Role of Central and Peripheral Vision in Expert Decision Making

The Role of Central and Peripheral Vision in Expert Decision Making

How late can you update gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays without detection?

Gaze-Contingent Manipulation of Color Perception

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About