The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
PsycEXTRA Dataset 2000
DOI: 10.1037/e624722009-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gay Rights, Patient Rights: The Implications of Sexual Orientation Conversion Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the idea of marriage to a member of the same sex may insinuate a sexual relationship that violates a very sacred ideal to mainstream Evangelicals, hence causing an even stronger negative affective response than is found on other measures. Perhaps this seemingly impossible difference in perspective on marriage and sexuality between the gay community and many in the Evangelical community can be bridged by emphasizing freedom of choice and determination for both communities, a commonly held value (Beckstead & Morrow, 2004;Haldeman, 2002;Schneider, Brown, & Glassgold, 2002;Worthington, 2004;Yarhouse & Burkett, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the idea of marriage to a member of the same sex may insinuate a sexual relationship that violates a very sacred ideal to mainstream Evangelicals, hence causing an even stronger negative affective response than is found on other measures. Perhaps this seemingly impossible difference in perspective on marriage and sexuality between the gay community and many in the Evangelical community can be bridged by emphasizing freedom of choice and determination for both communities, a commonly held value (Beckstead & Morrow, 2004;Haldeman, 2002;Schneider, Brown, & Glassgold, 2002;Worthington, 2004;Yarhouse & Burkett, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparable analogy might be age: individuals change with age but aging cannot be caused by individuals or others. It is not clear why anyone would want to change their gender/sex sexual orientation for reasons other than social stigma (Diamond, 2003b;Haldeman, 2002;Herek & Garnets, 2007) in which case social action-not individual change-seems required (assuming social action is possible). Shifts in sexual orientations might and do occur but cannot be imposed by selves or others.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Theories About Sexual Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical efforts to modify the sexual desires of those with predominantly (or exclusively) same-sex attractions have included such techniques as applying electric shocks to the hands or genitals, pairing nausea-inducing drugs with the presentation of homoerotic stimuli, reconditioning impulses to masturbate, deep brain stimulation, psychoanalytic therapy, “spiritual” interventions such as peer pressure and prayer, and even brain surgery (Cruz 1998; Haldeman 2002; Moan and Heath 1972; Schüklenk et al 1997). While some of these more invasive approaches are unlikely to be tried today, others persist.…”
Section: The Concern: Love- or Sexuality-altering Biotechnology Mightmentioning
confidence: 99%