2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2011.00179.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gay men in the police: identity disclosure and management issues

Abstract: Updating the paucity of UK research on lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) sexualities in the police, this study examines the identity disclosure and management practices of 20 gay police officers. Drawing on in‐depth interview data, our key finding is that gay police officers generally do not expect to be stigmatised but anticipate and experience positive disclosure experiences. Overall, the research reveals that gay officers actively seek to construct disclosure opportunities and adopt strategies of identity int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(76 reference statements)
2
72
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the aggressive masculinity of police and fire forces hampered an openly gay officer's efforts to earn trust and respect from his peers and made many men reluctant to disclose their sexual orientation (Bernstein & Kostelac, 2002;Burke, 1993;Miller, Forest, & Jurik, 2003). It did not follow, though, that lesbian officers and firefighters fit in effortlessly: many endured regular homophobic treatment and sexual harassment from their coworkers (Burke, 1993;Chetkovich, 1997;Lewis & Pitts, 2011;Martin, 1980;Rumens & Broomfield, 2012;Ward & Winstanley, 2006).…”
Section: How Does Discrimination Against Sexual Minorities Operate Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the aggressive masculinity of police and fire forces hampered an openly gay officer's efforts to earn trust and respect from his peers and made many men reluctant to disclose their sexual orientation (Bernstein & Kostelac, 2002;Burke, 1993;Miller, Forest, & Jurik, 2003). It did not follow, though, that lesbian officers and firefighters fit in effortlessly: many endured regular homophobic treatment and sexual harassment from their coworkers (Burke, 1993;Chetkovich, 1997;Lewis & Pitts, 2011;Martin, 1980;Rumens & Broomfield, 2012;Ward & Winstanley, 2006).…”
Section: How Does Discrimination Against Sexual Minorities Operate Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the job that a person chooses to work at is regarded by the society in which that person lives as inappropriate in terms of gender stereotypes, he/she often encounters difficulties related to this perception in the workplace. Possible issues are personal and occupational pressure, restriction for certain tasks (e.g., male nurses working in a labor ward in a maternity hospital), difficulties in growing positive relationships with colleagues, and, eventually, obstructions in career development (Dodson & Di Borders, 2006;Harding, 2007;McMillian, Morgan, & Ament, 2006;Osborne, 2004;Rumens & Broomfield, 2012;C. L. Williams, 1995;Young & James, 2001).…”
Section: Gender Schema Theory and Gender Rolesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, the occupations of flight attendant (Barry, 2007;Young & James, 2001), nurse (Harding, 2007;Lou, Yu, Hsu, & Dai, 2007), and police officer (Rumens & Broomfield, 2012) are all associated with strong gender connotations. The first two of these occupations require the feminine characteristics of tenderness and patience, whereas physical strength and toughness, traditionally masculine characteristics, are usually emphasized for police officers (Barry, Bacon, & Child, 1957).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…is there greater acceptance of lesbians in construction than bisexual men/women, than gay men or than transgendered people? ), and can occur unpredictably with mixed outcomes for sustaining a viable sense of personhood and career (Rumens and Kerfoot, 2009;Williams et al, 2009;Wright, 2011b;Rumens and Broomfield, 2012). There may be 'advantages' derived from gendered stereotypes for some sexual minorities over others seeking inclusion and acceptance within specific construction work sites (Wright, 2011b).…”
Section: Bisexualities In the Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There may be 'advantages' derived from gendered stereotypes for some sexual minorities over others seeking inclusion and acceptance within specific construction work sites (Wright, 2011b). Such hierarchies of acceptance among sexualities are regulated, in part, by gender norms, such as those used to denigrate and distinguish 'effeminate' gay masculinities from those more aligned to heterosexual masculinities at work (Rumens and Broomfield, 2012), creating interaction dilemmas in the workplace.…”
Section: Bisexualities In the Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%