2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03554-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gay Dating App Users Support and Utilize Sexual Health Features on Apps

Abstract: Men who have sex with men (MSM) frequently meet sex partners through dating apps. Research has demonstrated an association between app use and greater number of sex partners and STIs, but dating apps also pose an opportunity for intervention. By advocating for sexual health features on dating apps, Building Healthy Online Communities (BHOC) aims to increase communication about sexual health among app users. In partnership with Emory University, BHOC added questions to an annual survey of MSM. The questions ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Youth using dating apps less than once a week were nearly 50% more likely to test positive for STI compared with youth who did not use dating apps and more frequent users. Given that previous research has shown that frequent users of dating websites and apps have higher numbers of casual partners compared with nonusers, 21 our finding is surprising. Because more than of adolescent GBMSM report using apps to meet sexual partners, 21 we posit that infrequent dating app users may represent a higher-risk subpopulation who are less likely to adhere to dating behaviors that would reduce STI transmission.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Youth using dating apps less than once a week were nearly 50% more likely to test positive for STI compared with youth who did not use dating apps and more frequent users. Given that previous research has shown that frequent users of dating websites and apps have higher numbers of casual partners compared with nonusers, 21 our finding is surprising. Because more than of adolescent GBMSM report using apps to meet sexual partners, 21 we posit that infrequent dating app users may represent a higher-risk subpopulation who are less likely to adhere to dating behaviors that would reduce STI transmission.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Given that previous research has shown that frequent users of dating websites and apps have higher numbers of casual partners compared with nonusers, 21 our finding is surprising. Because more than of adolescent GBMSM report using apps to meet sexual partners, 21 we posit that infrequent dating app users may represent a higher-risk subpopulation who are less likely to adhere to dating behaviors that would reduce STI transmission. This finding underscores the need to investigate further the context in which dating apps are being used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…4 More recently, 75% of participants (n = 7867) of the 2019 American Men's Internet Survey, an online, cross-sectional, annual survey of MSM in the United States, reported using a dating app or website in the past year and 72% reported meeting a male partner through an app. 5 However, findings are mixed regarding those who use the Internet and apps for seeking sex partners and increased engagement in behaviors that put them at increased risk of acquiring or transmitting STI/HIV. Most studies have found that those who report online sex partner (OSP) more frequently engage in behaviors that put them at increased STI risk, such as condomless anal sex, a greater number of sex partners, and alcohol/drug use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, our data highlight the challenges of contact tracing for anonymous encounters. Therefore, there is a need for a rapid expansion of pre-exposure vaccine accessibility globally and innovative approaches for anonymous partner notification, for instance, through functional additions to the messaging systems of online dating apps, which many users would be in favour of 32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%