2014
DOI: 10.1021/ed500437a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian-Type Orbitals versus Slater-Type Orbitals: A Comparison

Abstract: The advantages of Gaussian-type orbitals (GTO) over Slater-type orbitals (STO) in quantum chemistry calculations are clarified here by means of a holistic approach. The popular Microsoft Office Excel program was used to create an interactive application with which students are able to explore the features of GTO, including automatic calculations and graphical displays. The simple case of the ground state wave function of the hydrogen atom is analyzed, for which the mathematical expressions are easily obtained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher excited states with l = 0 required a very large basis size in order to accurately calculate the binding energy due to the very sharp singularity of the wave function appearing at r = 0 (Kato cusp). This situation is similar to the well-known problem in the Slater-type versus Gaussian-type orbitals in quantum chemistry [76], since the harmonic oscillator is essentially a Gaussian basis. Such a sharp feature in the excitonic wave function is mitigated in the Keldysh potential as the 1/r divergence becomes logarithmic.…”
Section: Appendix C: Numerical Implementation Of Harmonic Oscillator supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The higher excited states with l = 0 required a very large basis size in order to accurately calculate the binding energy due to the very sharp singularity of the wave function appearing at r = 0 (Kato cusp). This situation is similar to the well-known problem in the Slater-type versus Gaussian-type orbitals in quantum chemistry [76], since the harmonic oscillator is essentially a Gaussian basis. Such a sharp feature in the excitonic wave function is mitigated in the Keldysh potential as the 1/r divergence becomes logarithmic.…”
Section: Appendix C: Numerical Implementation Of Harmonic Oscillator supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The higher excited states with l = 0 required a very large basis size in order to accurately calculate the binding energy due to the very sharp singularity of the wavefunction appearing at r = 0 (Kato cusp). This situation is similar to the well-known problem in the Slater-type versus Gaussian-type orbitals in quantum chemistry 57 , since harmonic oscillator (Hermite function) is essentially a Gaussian basis. Such a sharp feature in the excitonic wavefunction is mitigated in the Keldysh potential as the 1/r-divergence becomes logarithmic.…”
Section: Appendix C: Numerical Implementation Of Harmonic Oscillator ...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In quantum chemistry research, the mathematical description of atomic orbitals have been studied mainly with the use of Slater [25, 26] and Gaussian functions [27–29]. The Slater function has the correct cusp at the origin and the physical exponential decay at long range [30, 31], expected by the orbital representation, nevertheless, when a many‐electron system is taken into account, the matrix elements become very hard to calculate in the coordinate space [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In quantum chemistry research, the mathematical description of atomic orbitals have been studied mainly with the use of Slater [25,26] and Gaussian functions [27][28][29]. The Slater function has the correct cusp at the origin and the physical exponential decay at long range [30,31],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%