2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian Process Regression for Predictive But Interpretable Machine Learning Models: An Example of Predicting Mental Workload across Tasks

Abstract: There is increasing interest in real-time brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for the passive monitoring of human cognitive state, including cognitive workload. Too often, however, effective BCIs based on machine learning techniques may function as “black boxes” that are difficult to analyze or interpret. In an effort toward more interpretable BCIs, we studied a family of N-back working memory tasks using a machine learning model, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), which was both powerful and amenable to analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non‐parametric approaches like GPR and SVM theoretically assume infinite parameters and capture all the uncertainties in the data. These uncertainties are not captured in a parametric approach like ANN (Caywood, Roberts, Colombe, Greenwald, & Weiland, ). Additionally, ANN is a black‐box approach; however, GPR and SVM can be used for exploring and exploiting the inherent function defining the variations (Schulz, Speekenbrink, & Krause, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non‐parametric approaches like GPR and SVM theoretically assume infinite parameters and capture all the uncertainties in the data. These uncertainties are not captured in a parametric approach like ANN (Caywood, Roberts, Colombe, Greenwald, & Weiland, ). Additionally, ANN is a black‐box approach; however, GPR and SVM can be used for exploring and exploiting the inherent function defining the variations (Schulz, Speekenbrink, & Krause, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enhances the kriging model's reliability even without using many hyperparameters [9]. Furthermore, kriging is robust to unexpected events such as feature sets inconsistency or sudden reduction in quality of data [6]. Finally, the proposed ordinary kriging model's performance on seizure detection exceeds those of some machine learning models that were explored in this work.…”
Section: Proposed Solution Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, GPR is a well‐studied statistical model. The similarity modeling approach is intuitive, and its results are easy to interpret . In treatment response prediction, the kernel function allows for the identification of known subjects with similar conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%