2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-017-9673-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian Process Emulators for Computer Experiments with Inequality Constraints

Abstract: Physical phenomena are observed in many fields (science and engineering) and are often studied by time-consuming computer codes. These codes are analyzed with statistical models, often called emulators. In many situations, the physical system (computer model output) may be known to satisfy inequality constraints with respect to some or all input variables. Our aim is to build a model capable of incorporating both data interpolation and inequality constraints into a Gaussian process emulator. By using a functio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
143
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some representative examples include piecewise linear models [Neelon andDunson, 2004, Cai andDunson, 2007], Bernstein polynomials [Curtis and Ghosh, 2009], regression splines [Meyer et al, 2011], penalized spines [Brezger and Steiner, 2008], cumulative distribution functions [Bornkamp and Ickstadt, 2009], and restricted splines [Shively et al, 2011] used as the basis. Maatouk and Bay [2017] recently exploited a novel basis representation to equivalently represent various shape restrictions such as boundedness, monotonicity, convexity etc as non-negativity constraints on the basis coefficients. Although originally developed in the context of computer model emulation, the approach of Maatouk and Bay [2017] is broadly applicable to general shape constrained problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some representative examples include piecewise linear models [Neelon andDunson, 2004, Cai andDunson, 2007], Bernstein polynomials [Curtis and Ghosh, 2009], regression splines [Meyer et al, 2011], penalized spines [Brezger and Steiner, 2008], cumulative distribution functions [Bornkamp and Ickstadt, 2009], and restricted splines [Shively et al, 2011] used as the basis. Maatouk and Bay [2017] recently exploited a novel basis representation to equivalently represent various shape restrictions such as boundedness, monotonicity, convexity etc as non-negativity constraints on the basis coefficients. Although originally developed in the context of computer model emulation, the approach of Maatouk and Bay [2017] is broadly applicable to general shape constrained problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maatouk and Bay [2017] recently exploited a novel basis representation to equivalently represent various shape restrictions such as boundedness, monotonicity, convexity etc as non-negativity constraints on the basis coefficients. Although originally developed in the context of computer model emulation, the approach of Maatouk and Bay [2017] is broadly applicable to general shape constrained problems. Zhou et al [2018] adapted their approach to handle a combination of shape constraints in a nuclear physics application to model the electric form factor of a proton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contributions which are presented in Sections 2, 3 and 4 correspond to the references [14,35], [49] and [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty of the problem comes from the fact that, when incorporating an infinite number of inequality constraints into a GP, the resulting process is not a GP in general. In this section, we show that the model developed in [35] is capable of incorporating an infinite number of inequality constraints into a GP model…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%