2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-019-03553-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian-Process-Driven Adaptive Sampling for Reduced-Order Modeling of Texture Effects in Polycrystalline Alpha-Ti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many surrogate model building approaches can be used for building structureproperty linkages, prior work has shown the benefits of using Gaussian process regression (GPR) in combination with the MKS feature engineering described earlier [8,9,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. GPR is particularly powerful when building surrogate models for complex nonlinear systems/phenomena, where the parametric model forms are not yet established.…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although many surrogate model building approaches can be used for building structureproperty linkages, prior work has shown the benefits of using Gaussian process regression (GPR) in combination with the MKS feature engineering described earlier [8,9,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. GPR is particularly powerful when building surrogate models for complex nonlinear systems/phenomena, where the parametric model forms are not yet established.…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature engineering developed in the MKS framework is unsupervised in that the microstructure feature selection is completely uninfluenced by the output variables targeted by the surrogate model. Although a large number of options exist for building the surrogate models of interest, recent work in the MKS framework [8,9,[15][16][17][18][19][20] has demonstrated that Gaussian process regression (GPR) [14,21] offers advantages because of its ability to formulate non-parametric models while allowing for a rigorous consideration of the prediction uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernadez et al Fernandez-Zelaia et al (2018) utilized Bayesian inference to quantify the uncertainty in stressstrain curves, where model parameters are treated as random variables. Tallman et al Tallman et al (2019Tallman et al ( , 2020 applied Gaussian process regression and the Materials Knowledge System framework to predict a set of homogenized materials properties with uncertainty from a distribution function for crystallography orientations and textures. Inductive design exploration method (IDEM) Ellis and McDowell (2017);McDowell et al (2009); Choi et al (2008) has been introduced as a materials design methodology to identify feasible and robust design for microstructure features, which has been broadly applied to many practical problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diehl et al [14] proposed an ICME workflow coupling DAMASK and DREAM.3D, which we also adopt in this work, that was subsequently employed in Liu et al [31,30] and Diehl et al [15] to quantify the influence of grain shape and crystallographic orientation of fine-structure dual-phase and high-strength low-alloy steel respectively. A Gaussian process (GP) regression model and a Materials Knowledge System framework were combined in Tallman et al [48,49] to model a set of homogenized materials properties with respect to an orientation distribution function. Liu et al [28,29] developed a physics-based microstructure descriptors approach to parameterize microstructures as inputs and constructed the structure-properties map for a localization problem using regression trees and support vector machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surrogate model can then be exhaustively sampled without running ICME models which greatly reduces the computational efforts. While any ML tools can be used for this surrogate, in this paper, we limit the scope of our study to the well-known Gaussian process (GP) regression model, as demonstrated by Tallman et al [48,49]. For each realization of this vector, an ensemble of microstructure SVEs is generated using DREAM.3D, and the homogeneized material respose is calculated using a CPFEM model, e.g., DAMASK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%