The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1061/jpeodx.0000174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian Mixture Model to Characterize Payload Distributions for Predominant Truck Configurations and Body Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The truck tare weight is influenced by axle configuration, truck body and drive terrain, material used for manufacturing, on-board equipment, and fuel [50]. The B-double and the road train, having longer trailer frames, more axles, and larger trucks to pull heavier weights, tend to have heavier tare weights but material types and on-board equipment can be selected towards a lighter design (e.g., plastic mudguards, aluminum rims, bolsters and bull bars) and reduce how much of the legal GVW advantage is taken up by added vehicle tare weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The truck tare weight is influenced by axle configuration, truck body and drive terrain, material used for manufacturing, on-board equipment, and fuel [50]. The B-double and the road train, having longer trailer frames, more axles, and larger trucks to pull heavier weights, tend to have heavier tare weights but material types and on-board equipment can be selected towards a lighter design (e.g., plastic mudguards, aluminum rims, bolsters and bull bars) and reduce how much of the legal GVW advantage is taken up by added vehicle tare weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tare mass of a truck depends on axle configuration, truck body and drive terrain type, material types used for manufacturing, on-board equipment, and fuel [21]. The B-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tare mass of a truck depends on axle configuration, truck body and drive terrain type, material types used for manufacturing, on-board equipment, and fuel [21]. The B-double and the road train, having longer trailer frames, more axles, and larger trucks to pull heavier weights, tend to have heavier tare weights but material types and on board equipment can be selected towards a lighter design (e.g., plastic mudguards, aluminum rims, bolsters and bull bars) and reduce how much of the legal GVW advantage is taken up by added vehicle tare weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involved removing records with GVWs less than an assumed tare weight and evaluating the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile GVWs compared with the original data presented for 3-S2s. Regehr et al (35) reported mean tare weights for various 3-S2 body types in Manitoba, ranging from 13,400 kg to 15,700 kg; therefore, the assumed tare weight values for the analysis were 14,000 kg and 16,000 kg.…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data presented in this longitudinal study include both published and unpublished on-road truck surveys conducted since the early 1970s by the Manitoba provincial government and the University of Manitoba Transport Information Group (UMTIG) at the Headingley and West Hawk weigh scales. These surveys were conducted for various research purposes (e.g., see 24,26,27,34,35) and, as such, had differing durations and data collection times typically designed to capture weekly and seasonal truck traffic trends. However, the general aim of the surveys was to establish a longitudinal truck weight dataset to monitor changes in truck operating weights.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%