1996
DOI: 10.4064/aa-78-1-75-89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauss sums for O⁺(2n,q)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some expressions of Gauss sums (1.1) for various finite classical groups were obtained by using Bruhat decompositions of those groups with respect to certain maximal parabolic subgroups [7][8][9][10][11][12]14]. The main formula (3.1) allows us to get alternative expressions for those Gauss sums.…”
Section: Main Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some expressions of Gauss sums (1.1) for various finite classical groups were obtained by using Bruhat decompositions of those groups with respect to certain maximal parabolic subgroups [7][8][9][10][11][12]14]. The main formula (3.1) allows us to get alternative expressions for those Gauss sums.…”
Section: Main Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, alternative expressions of those sums were gotten by using Bruhat decompositions with respect to certain maximal parabolic subgroups of the finite classical groups (cf. [7][8][9][10][11][12]14]). In this section, equating two different expressions of the Gauss sum for each finite classical group, we will be able to produce identities, some of which are new and some old.…”
Section: Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gauss sums for classical groups over a finite field have been extensively studied by Kim in several articles [9,[6][7][8]11,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]1], and more recently, he also applied the Gauss sum for special linear groups over finite fields to coding theory [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the sum in (1.3) vanishes for r ¼ 1, the polynomials involving (1.3) do not appear in that case. For r ¼ 1, similar sums for other classical groups over a finite field had been considered ( [7]- [12], [16], [17]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%