2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/abae45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauss–Bonnet–Chern approach to the averaged Universe

Abstract: The standard model of cosmology with postulated dark energy and dark matter sources may be considered as a fairly successful fitting model to observational data. However, this model leaves the question of the physical origin of these dark components open. Fully relativistic contributions that act like dark energy on large scales and like dark matter on smaller scales can be found through generalization of the standard model by spatially averaging the inhomogeneous Universe within general relativity. The spatia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(133 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, formula (43) suggests that the structure formation might play a major role on the global expansion of our Universe if the topology is non-Euclidean. This behaviour is also present in general relativity [3], but in our case it arises at a non-relativistic level, as it shows that the Universe might have a local Newtonian dynamics, but a global dynamics which differs from the one of a homogeneous Universe. However, quantifying the mean specific energy remains difficult because it depends on the mesoscopic scale, which is not well defined in cosmology.…”
Section: Solving the Constraint Equationssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Then, formula (43) suggests that the structure formation might play a major role on the global expansion of our Universe if the topology is non-Euclidean. This behaviour is also present in general relativity [3], but in our case it arises at a non-relativistic level, as it shows that the Universe might have a local Newtonian dynamics, but a global dynamics which differs from the one of a homogeneous Universe. However, quantifying the mean specific energy remains difficult because it depends on the mesoscopic scale, which is not well defined in cosmology.…”
Section: Solving the Constraint Equationssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The rest mass M D of the fluid within D is thus more naturally defined in terms of the proper volume measure √ b d 3 x. Note that the two covariant 15 volume measures √ h d 3 x and √ b d 3 x coincide in the case of a flow-orthogonal foliation (possible for an irrotational fluid), which is the situation considered in Papers I and II. Hence, a degeneracy between both volumes is present in these papers, while they are distinct for any other choice of foliation.…”
Section: The Regional Rest Mass and Its Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will also recover the expected relation between total rest mass and averaged rest mass density. 15 As h(t, x k ) d 3 x, the fluid-orthogonal volume 3−form b(t, x k ) d 3 x is also invariant under a change of spatial coordinates, as can be checked either directly or by rewriting it as…”
Section: The Regional Rest Mass and Its Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a side note, Mess results circulated as a draft for many years and piqued the interest of the 2+1 quantum gravity community in the 90's [Car98]. Since then, many works have focused on quantizations of Teichmüllerlike spaces [BW16, BW17, BW19, FG06, MW19] and their interpretation as quantizations for quantum gravity [Car98,MS16], relations with the cosmological microwave background [AAA `19] have been investigated [BMS14] and more recently link with averaged Einstein equations in relativistic inhomogeneous cosmology [Buc07] has been made [BB20].…”
Section: Causal Conditions and Mess Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%