2017
DOI: 10.1111/echo.13453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauging the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: The important interplay between predictor variables and definition of a favorable outcome

Abstract: The definition of a favorable CRT response influenced the optimal predictor variable(s). Standardization of defining a favorable response to CRT is needed to guide clinical decision making processes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study evaluated the long‐term impact of an active fixation LV lead in CS guided by electrical delay in patients with Heart Failure due to CAD. To date, a uniform definition of response to CRT is lacking, and in literature, there are often heterogeneous criteria 14 . For this reason, we assessed only the clinical response by objective assessment of death due to HF and rehospitalization for HF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study evaluated the long‐term impact of an active fixation LV lead in CS guided by electrical delay in patients with Heart Failure due to CAD. To date, a uniform definition of response to CRT is lacking, and in literature, there are often heterogeneous criteria 14 . For this reason, we assessed only the clinical response by objective assessment of death due to HF and rehospitalization for HF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a uniform definition of response to CRT is lacking, and in literature, there are often heterogeneous criteria. 14 For this reason, we assessed only the clinical response by objective assessment of death due to HF and rehospitalization for HF. A proper patient selection currently is recommended in order to maximize post‐procedural results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В качестве ключевого параметра ответа на РТ также рассматривалось увеличение ФВ ЛЖ до 20 % спустя год после РТ [44]. Поздний ответ на РТ (более 6 мес) в виде обратного ремоделирования ассоциирован с ишемической этиологией и ФК ХСН <III [45].…”
Section: патофизиологические аспекты и клинические эффекты метода ртunclassified